...
首页> 外文期刊>Geomorphology >Comment on: Alam Akhtar, Ahmad Shabir, Sultan Bhat, M., Ahmad Bashir, 2015. Tectonic evolution of Kashmir basin in northwest Himalayas. Geomorphology doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.025
【24h】

Comment on: Alam Akhtar, Ahmad Shabir, Sultan Bhat, M., Ahmad Bashir, 2015. Tectonic evolution of Kashmir basin in northwest Himalayas. Geomorphology doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.025

机译:评论:Alam Akhtar,Ahmad Shabir,Sultan Bhat,M.,Ahmad Bashir,2015年。克什米尔盆地在喜马拉雅山西北部的构造演化。地貌学doi:10.1016 / j.geomorph.2015.03.025

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alam et al. (2015) have challenged the classic piggyback tectonic model for the development of Kashmir basin, NW Himalaya. However, all the evidence shown is completely contrary to the geologic, tectonic, structural, seismologic, geodetic, and geomorphic data of previous works. A perfectly planar major (similar to 165 km) dextral strike-slip fault has been mapped; however, with such planar geometry, any strike-slip fault cannot produce a pull-apart basin because such basins are characteristic features of step-overs and linkage fault geometries. And the Horsetail structures are impossible for a major planar strike-slip fault geometry that is proposed by the authors. The recent geodetic data of the Kashmir basin strongly refutes the pure strike-slip model. Therefore, the structures, geomorphology, geology, and kinematics associated with typical dextral strike-slip fault geometry completely contradict to what has been proposed by Alam et al. (2015). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:阿拉姆等。 (2015)对喜马拉雅西北部克什米尔盆地的开发挑战了经典的背back构造模型。但是,所显示的所有证据与先前工作的地质,构造,结构,地震,大地和地貌数据完全相反。已经绘制出了一个完全平坦的主要(类似于165 km)右旋走滑断层。然而,在这样的平面几何条件下,任何走滑断层都不能产生拉脱式盆地,因为这种盆地是阶跃和连动断层几何特征。作者提出的主要的平面走滑断层几何形状不可能采用马尾结构。克什米尔盆地的最新大地测量数据强烈反驳了纯走滑模型。因此,与典型的右旋走滑断层几何学有关的结构,地貌,地质学和运动学与Alam等人提出的完全矛盾。 (2015)。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号