首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle
【24h】

Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle

机译:牛的生物政治学和希克牛荒野中的怪物前途

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the early 1980s the Dutch ecologist Frans Vera began an ambitious ecological restoration experiment on a polder in the Netherlands. He introduced herds of 'back-bred' Heck cattle and other large herbivores and encouraged them to 'de-domesticate' themselves and 'rewild' the landscape they inhabit. His intervention has triggered a great deal of interest and controversy. It is being replicated and adapted across Europe as part of a wider interest in 'rewilding' in nature conservation. This innovative approach rubs up against powerful and prevalent practices of environmental management. This paper examines these frictions by mapping the character and exploring the interface between different modes of nonhuman biopolitics - in this case the powerful ways in which modern humans live with and govern cattle. Focusing on the story of Heck cattle and the bovine biopolitics of their rewilding it attends in particular to the character, place and promise of monsters. It first outlines a conceptual framework for examining nonhuman biopolitics and teratology (the study of monsters), identifying fertile tensions between the work of Haraway, Derrida and Deleuze. It then provides a typology of four prevalent modes of bovine biopolitics -namely agriculture, conservation, welfare and biosecurity - and their associated monsters. This paper identifies rewilding as a fifth mode and examines frictions at its interfaces with the other four. Developing the conceptual framework the paper examines what these frictions tell us about the understandings of life that circulate in the ontological politics of contemporary environmentalisms. In conclusion the paper critically examines the monstrous promise of rewilding, in relation to tensions between the convivial aspirations of Haraway and Deleuze.
机译:在1980年代初期,荷兰生态学家Frans Vera在荷兰的一个pol田上开始了雄心勃勃的生态恢复实验。他介绍了“后代”黑克牛和其他大型草食动物,并鼓励他们“去家养”自己并“野化”他们所居住的景观。他的干预引起了极大的兴趣和争议。它正在整个欧洲复制和改编,这是人们对“自然保护”“重新野化”的广泛兴趣的一部分。这种创新方法与强大而流行的环境管理实践相抵触。本文通过绘制人物特征并探索非人类生物政治的不同模式之间的接口来研究这些摩擦,在这种情况下,现代人类与牛生活并管理牛的有效方式。着眼于赫克(Heck)牛的故事以及他们野蛮的牛的生物政治,它尤其涉及怪物的性格,地位和前途。它首先概述了一个概念框架,用于研究非人类的生物政治和术语学(对怪物的研究),确定哈拉威,德里达和德勒兹之间工作之间的肥沃张力。然后,它提供了四种主要的牛群生物政治模式(即农业,自然保护,福利和生物安全)及其相关因素的分类学。本文将野外游走确定为第五种模式,并研究其与其他四种模式之间的摩擦。在发展概念框架的过程中,本文研究了这些摩擦告诉我们关于当代环境主义本体论政治中流传的对生命的理解。总而言之,本文就哈拉威和德勒兹的积极愿望之间的紧张关系,严格审查了野蛮的巨大希望。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geoforum》 |2013年第8期|249-259|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography, Kings College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom;

    Department of Geography, Kings College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biopolitics; Monsters; Cows; Rewilding; Oostvaardersplassen;

    机译:生物政治学;样品;牛;狂野植物园;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:36:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号