...
首页> 外文期刊>Futures >MISLEADING CONCLUSION
【24h】

MISLEADING CONCLUSION

机译:结论错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In [the May] mid-month update [you concluded] that the 1-2 ratio option strategy was better than buying the outright call. What the explanation failed to include was the 1-2 ratio option strategy had the ability to lose the amount paid for the spread (72.5$) plus the difference between the two strikes ($1). The discussion did not disclose the full potential loss (cost) of the trade, which is misleading and could lead novice option traders to employ that strategy unknowingly.
机译:在[5月]月中更新[您得出结论]中,1-2比率期权策略比买入直接买权更好。该解释未能包括的是1-2比率期权策略,该策略有能力损失为价差支付的金额(72.5 $)加上两次执行价格之间的差额($ 1)。讨论并未披露交易的全部潜在损失(成本),这是误导性的,并可能导致新手期权交易者在不知不觉中采用该策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号