首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Puzzling, powering and perpetuating: Long-term decision-making by the Dutch Delta Committee
【24h】

Puzzling, powering and perpetuating: Long-term decision-making by the Dutch Delta Committee

机译:令人费解,强大和永存:荷兰三角洲委员会的长期决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Long term policy issues like climate change adaptation are considered wicked in the sense that uncertain knowledge and volatile societal understandings associated to the issue might jeopardize long term sustainment of adaptation policies. Uncertainty or sudden societal opposition might politically be employed to dismantle earlier made policies or investments and therefore threaten longterm adaptive capacity. This article highlights how successful long-term decision-making can be understood as a matter of puzzling over uncertainty and powering for getting things done, but above all requires sustainment of these decisions on the long term. For doing so the paper analyses the decision-making process of the Dutch Delta Committee in 2008, which firmly put the climate adaptation issue on the Dutch political agenda and subsequently sustained the issue on the policy agenda through the creation of a Delta Commissioner, a Delta Fund and a Delta Act. Our analysis illustrates how the crucial actors in and around the Second Delta Committee deployed strategies of puzzling, powering, and what we define as perpetuation to deal with the long-term policy issue of climate adaptation. The latter is especially important for policy issues that require a long-term continued effort by policy-makers, or will only manifest themselves on the long term. Then, it is not only important to create meaning and organize power now, but also to maintain and ensure that meaning and power for time to come. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:从某种意义上说,诸如气候变化适应之类的长期政策问题被认为是邪恶的,因为与该问题相关的不确定的知识和不稳定的社会理解可能会损害适应政策的长期维持。政治上的不确定性或突然的社会对立可能会被用来拆除较早制定的政策或投资,从而威胁到长期的适应能力。本文重点介绍了如何将成功的长期决策理解为令人困惑的不确定性问题以及为完成任务提供动力的问题,但最重要的是,这些决策需要长期坚持下去。为此,本文分析了荷兰三角洲委员会在2008年的决策过程,该过程将气候适应问题牢牢地放在了荷兰的政治议程上,随后通过设立三角洲专员(Delta基金和三角洲法案。我们的分析表明,第二三角洲委员会及其周围的关键角色如何部署令人费解,加电的战略,以及我们定义为永续的战略,以应对气候适应的长期政策问题。后者对于需要决策者长期努力或仅长期显现的政策问题尤为重要。然后,不仅要立即创造意义和组织权力,而且要在将来有时间保持并确保意义和权力,这一点很重要。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Futures》 |2016年第2期|7-17|共11页
  • 作者单位

    NSOB, Lange Voorhout 17, NL-2514 EB The Hague, Netherlands|Erasmus Univ, Strategy & Foresight, Fac Social Sci, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

    NSOB, Lange Voorhout 17, NL-2514 EB The Hague, Netherlands;

    Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands|PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, The Hague, Netherlands;

    NSOB, Lange Voorhout 17, NL-2514 EB The Hague, Netherlands|Erasmus Univ, Publ Adm, Fac Social Sci, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Long-term decision making; Policy; Scenarios; Climate issues; Government;

    机译:长期决策;政策;情景;气候问题;政府;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:50:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号