首页> 外文期刊>Fusion Engineering and Design >Comparison study on neutronic analysis of the K-DEMO water cooled ceramic breeder blanket using MCNP and ATTILA
【24h】

Comparison study on neutronic analysis of the K-DEMO water cooled ceramic breeder blanket using MCNP and ATTILA

机译:用MCNP和ATTILA对K-DEMO水冷陶瓷育种毯进行中子分析的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comparison study of main parameter calculations: neutron wall loading (NWL), tritium breeding ratio (TBR), and nuclear heating, on a Korean fusion demonstration reactor (K-DEMO) neutronic analysis model using MCNP and ATTILA was performed to investigate the feasibility of using ATTILA for the main parameter calculations. The model was created by commercial CAD program (Pro-Engineer (TM)) as a 22.5 degrees sector of tokamak consisting of major components such as blankets, shields, divertors, vacuum vessels (VV), toroidal field (TF) coils, and others, which was directly imported into ATTILA by Parasolid file. The discretizing in space, angle, and energy variables were refined for application of the K-DEMO neutronic analysis model through an iterative process since these variables greatly impact on accuracy, solution times, and memory consumptions in ATTILA. The main parameter calculations using ATTILA and the result of comparison studies indicate that the NWL distributions by two codes were almost agreed within discrepancy of 3.3%; the TBR distribution using ATTILA was slightly bigger than MCNP with a difference 3.9%; the nuclear heating values on TF coils and VV were bigger than MCNP with relatively high difference (17% and 28%). As a result of comparisons, ATTILA shows close agreement with MCNP within reasonable discrepancy ranges (3.3-28%). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在韩国核聚变示范反应堆(K-DEMO)中子分析模型上使用MCNP和ATTILA对主要参数计算:中子壁载荷(NWL),tri繁殖率(TBR)和核加热进行了比较研究,以探讨可行性使用ATTILA进行主要参数计算的过程。该模型是由商业CAD程序(Pro-Engineer(TM))创建的,为22.5度的托卡马克扇形区,由毛毯,护罩,分流器,真空容器(VV),环形场(TF)线圈等主要部件组成,它是通过Parasolid文件直接导入到ATTILA的。由于这些变量极大地影响了ATTILA的准确性,求解时间和内存消耗,因此对空间,角度和能量变量的离散性进行了改进,以通过迭代过程应用K-DEMO中子分析模型。使用ATTILA进行的主要参数计算和比较研究的结果表明,两个编码的NWL分布在3.3%的差异内几乎是一致的;使用ATTILA的TBR分布略大于MCNP,相差3.9%; TF线圈和VV的核热值均比MCNP大,差异较大(分别为17%和28%)。比较的结果是,ATTILA与MCNP在合理的差异范围内(3.3-28%)显示出紧密的一致性。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号