首页> 外文期刊>French History >Not a right but a public function: the debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation
【24h】

Not a right but a public function: the debate in the French National Assembly over the 1872 law on jury formation

机译:不是权利而是公共职能:法国国民议会关于1872年陪审团形成法的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Because of the highly politicized nature of the French judicial system in the nineteenth century, laws governing the selection of jurors were often the subject of strong political debate. There were repeated controversies over which citizens should be jurors and which authorities should draw up the annual jury lists from which the trial panels were drawn. Perhaps no event better reflected the nature of the controversy than the debate which occurred in the National Assembly in 1872, when the conservative government proposed an act which gave the judiciary power to revise the annual jury lists drawn up by elected officials. However, liberal deputies opposed the act because they maintained it gave too much power to a conservative judiciary in determining which citizens should be jurors. The debate in fact went to the heart of the nineteenth-century struggle between the Right and Left.
机译:由于19世纪法国司法系统的高度政治化性质,管辖陪审员甄选的法律常常是激烈的政治辩论的主题。关于哪些公民应担任陪审员,哪些当局应制定年度陪审团名单,由这些陪审团组成,这引起了多次争议。也许没有什么事情比1872年国民议会的辩论能更好地反映争议的性质,当时的保守党政府提出了一项法案,赋予司法机构修改民选官员起草的年度陪审团名单的权力。但是,自由党代表反对该法案,因为他们认为该法案在确定哪些公民应担任陪审员方面赋予了保守的司法机构太多的权力。实际上,辩论进入了19世纪左右右派斗争的核心。

著录项

  • 来源
    《French History》 |2007年第4期|395-410|共16页
  • 作者

    James M. Donovan;

  • 作者单位

    The author is Associate Professor of History at Penn State University jwd9{at}psu.edu;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:16:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号