首页> 外文期刊>Food Chemistry >Comparative analysis of standardised and common modifications of methods for lipid extraction for the determination of fatty acids
【24h】

Comparative analysis of standardised and common modifications of methods for lipid extraction for the determination of fatty acids

机译:脂质提取法测定脂肪酸的标准方法和常用方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Various standard techniques are commonly used for lipid extraction, but a comparative analysis amongst the different methods has not been assessed. Purpose: To compare three commonly used procedures for the extraction of fatty acids from flaxseed, with adjustments for lower solvent volumes. Methods: Lipids were extracted from ground flaxseed using the International Organization for Standard-ization (ISO) method, the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) method, the Folch method, and a modified AOAC procedure using lower solvent volume. Fatty acid concentrations and percent com-position were determined by gas chromatography (GC) and the identities of the fatty acids were con-firmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The extent of lipid peroxidation was also assessed using the thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) assay. Results: GC analysis revealed that total fatty acid recoveries were not statistically different across the var-ious methods (P> 0.05). However, the ISO extraction procedure resulted in higher concentrations of sat-urated fatty acids and lower concentrations of unsaturated fatty acids, as compared with the Folch and conventional AOAC methods. Fatty acid concentrations were similar with the conventional high-volume and the modified low-solvent AOAC procedures. GCMS analysis confirmed the identity of the measured fatty acids. All assays produced TBARS, which were highest in the conventional AOAC method, followed by the Folch method (P< 0.05) and the ISO method, respectively (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Total fatty acid concentrations were equal after the different extraction methods. It appears that mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids in flaxseed are underestimated after extraction with the ISO method and that the solvent volumes used in the AOAC method can be decreased without compromising fatty acid concentrations. The lower yield in unsaturated fatty acids with the ISO method is not likely due to an increase in fatty acid peroxidation.
机译:背景:各种标准技术常用于脂质提取,但尚未评估不同方法之间的比较分析。目的:比较三种常用的从亚麻籽中提取脂肪酸的方法,并针对较低的溶剂量进行了调整。方法:使用国际标准化组织(ISO)方法,官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)方法,Folch方法和使用较低溶剂量的改良AOAC程序从亚麻籽中提取脂质。通过气相色谱法(GC)测定脂肪酸浓度和组成百分数,并通过气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)确定脂肪酸的身份。还使用硫代巴比妥酸反应性物种(TBARS)分析评估了脂质过氧化的程度。结果:GC分析表明,各种方法中的总脂肪酸回收率在统计学上没有差异(P> 0.05)。但是,与Folch和常规AOAC方法相比,ISO提取程序导致较高浓度的饱和脂肪酸和较低浓度的不饱和脂肪酸。脂肪酸浓度与常规的高容量和改良的低溶剂AOAC程序相似。 GCMS分析证实了所测脂肪酸的身份。所有测定均产生了TBARS,其在常规AOAC方法中最高,其次分别是Folch方法(P <0.05)和ISO方法(P <0.05)。结论:不同提取方法后总脂肪酸浓度相等。看来用ISO方法萃取后亚麻籽中的单不饱和和多不饱和脂肪酸被低估了,可以在不影响脂肪酸浓度的情况下减少AOAC方法中使用的溶剂量。由于脂肪酸过氧化作用的增加,采用ISO方法降低不饱和脂肪酸的收率不太可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号