首页> 外文期刊>Focus >Welfare policy choices in the states: Does the hard line follow the color line?
【24h】

Welfare policy choices in the states: Does the hard line follow the color line?

机译:各州的福利政策选择:硬线是否沿色线?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the 1990s, federal welfare reform shifted control over many aspects of social provision down to the state level. Some observers predicted the states would act as "laboratories of democracy" seeking out new and better ways to solve problems related to poverty. Others suggested the states would "race to the bottom" in an effort to pare costs and avoid becoming a comparatively generous "magnet" for low-income families. State policy choices, however, are more than just efforts to solve problems, and they can rarely be explained solely by the urge to minimize costs. They are, at root, political decisions, reflecting the wide range of values, beliefs, demands, and constraints that shape governance in a diverse democracy.
机译:在1990年代,联邦福利改革将社会保障的许多方面的控制权下放到州一级。一些观察家预测,各州将充当“民主实验室”,寻求解决贫困问题的新的更好的方法。其他人则建议各州“竞相追逐”以削减成本,并避免成为低收入家庭相对慷慨的“磁铁”。但是,国家政策的选择不仅仅是解决问题的努力,而且很少能仅靠将成本降到最低的冲动来解释。从根本上讲,它们是政治决策,反映了塑造多元化民主中的治理的广泛的价值观,信念,要求和约束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号