...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire >National review of community risk methodology across the UK Fire and Rescue Service
【24h】

National review of community risk methodology across the UK Fire and Rescue Service

机译:全国对英国消防和救援局社区风险方法的审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The NTU research provides, for the first time, a national view on how RMPs are being developed in individual fire and rescue services. It shows that the creation of a national tool to assist fire and rescue services only works if it adds value to the work already taking place at a local level. There is much to be learned from the FSEC experience and there is more work required to understand that before a new toolkit based approach is agreed. Agreeing a national definition of risk will provide a firm foundation on which to develop RMPs. The value of data and evidence to underpin RMPs is clear: staff need access to national datasets based on meaningful data standards. Staff also need to have skills and training to carry out their work on RMPs. The discovery phase of the NFCC Digital and Data Programme has also come to similar conclusions about the need to respond to the professional needs of this group of staff.
机译:NTU的研究首次提供了关于如何在个人消防和救援服务中开发RMP的全国性观点。它表明,只有在为已经在地方一级进行的工作增加价值的情况下,创建辅助消防和救援服务的国家工具才能奏效。从FSEC的经验中可以学到很多东西,还需要做更多的工作来了解这一点,然后再商定基于新工具箱的方法。同意风险的国家定义将为制定RMP提供坚实的基础。支持RMP的数据和证据的价值显而易见:员工需要根据有意义的数据标准访问国家数据集。工作人员还需要掌握技能和培训以开展有关RMP的工作。 NFCC数字和数据计划的发现阶段也得出了类似的结论,即需要满足这批工作人员的专业需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fire》 |2019年第1423期|24-27|共4页
  • 作者

    Phil Loach;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号