首页> 外文期刊>Fire and Materials >A Comparison of Fire Retarded and Non-Fire Retarded Wood-based Wall linings Exposed to Fire in an Enclosure
【24h】

A Comparison of Fire Retarded and Non-Fire Retarded Wood-based Wall linings Exposed to Fire in an Enclosure

机译:密闭空间中着火的非阻燃木质木板墙衬砌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Full-scale fire experiments were carried out in an ISO room to study the behaviour of commonly used cellulosic lining materials in real fire conditions. In addition to the temperature measurements recommended by the ISO 9705, temperature recordings were made at each node of grid lines on the wall lining surfaces. Four lining materials were chosen to represent different types of products and the surface spread of classifications determined using the BS 476 Part 7 flame spread test environment. The linings included fire retarded, melamine faced and non-fire retarded boards which facilitated a comparative study of the behaviour of these materials with respect to ignition, flame spread, heat release rate and time to flashover. Corner fire scenarios were used in all the experiments. A T shape flame spread pattern on the surface of the two adjacent walls was observed prior to flashover. Prior to the onset of flashover conditions, downward opposed flow surface flame spread to the wall/ceiling intersection. For the non-retarded wood based materials, such as plywood and medium density fibre board, flashover conditions occurred approximately 4 min after the start of the experiment. However, the fire retarded chipboard ignition was delayed by some 11 min 45 s after which flame spread was very rapid with flashover occurring within a further 1 min 45 s. An explanation for this particular behaviour is the considerable pre-heating which occurred during the pre-ignition period. For the fire retarded linings, much higher surface temperatures were recorded compared with those for non-fire retarded linings. It was found that the areas of the fire retarded linings facing the source flame suffered extensive pyrolysis and charring which penetrated to the rear surface of the lining.
机译:在ISO机房中进行了全面的防火实验,以研究实际火灾条件下常用的纤维素衬里材料的性能。除了ISO 9705建议的温度测量外,还在壁衬表面上的网格线的每个节点处进行了温度记录。选择了四种衬里材料来代表不同类型的产品,并使用BS 476 Part 7火焰蔓延测试环境确定了表面蔓延的类别。内衬包括阻燃,三聚氰胺饰面和非阻燃板,这有助于对这些材料在着火,火焰蔓延,放热率和闪络时间方面的性能进行比较研究。在所有实验中均使用了角落射击场景。在闪络之前观察到两个相邻壁的表面上的T形火焰蔓延图案。在闪络条件出现之前,向下流动的相反表面火焰蔓延至墙/天花板相交处。对于非延迟的木质材料,例如胶合板和中密度纤维板,在实验开始后约4分钟发生闪燃条件。但是,阻燃刨花板点火延迟了大约11分钟45 s,此后火焰迅速蔓延,在接下来的1分钟45 s内又发生了飞弧。对于这种特殊行为的解释是在预点火期间发生的相当大的预热。与非阻燃衬里相比,防火衬里的表面温度要高得多。发现面向源火焰的阻燃衬里的区域经历了广泛的热解和炭化,并渗透到衬里的后表面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号