首页> 外文期刊>Fire and materials >A Comparative Analysis of Protocols for Measuring Heat Transmission Through Flame Resistant Materials: Capturing the Effects of Thermal Shrinkage
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Protocols for Measuring Heat Transmission Through Flame Resistant Materials: Capturing the Effects of Thermal Shrinkage

机译:测量通过阻燃材料传热的协议的比较分析:捕获热收缩的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bench-scale tests measuring the thermal protective performance of textile materials do not capture the effect of thermal shrinkage, primarily because of the planar geometry of the test device. The performance of single-layer fabrics commonly used in protective garments is compared here following several protocols, including the use of a new cylindrical device as well as standard and modified ASTM, CGSB and ISO procedures, with and without a 6.35 mm air gap between the fabric and the sensor. Both the time to reach the second degree burn criterion and the time for the sensor to register a 24℃ temperature rise were measured. Fabrics that shrink had reduced thermal protection when measured with the cylindrical device, compared with other tests. Two-way analysis of variance indicated that, although the dependent measures differ significantly among fabrics, the nature and extent of those differences depend on the test used. One-way analyses of variance indicate that each method differentiates among the fabrics. However, most tests in which the fabrics are in contact with the sensor rank heaviest fabrics as the most protective. Among the tests incorporating a space between the fabric and sensor, those using the cylindrical device differentiate best between lighter fabrics that shrink and those that do not. Regression analyses of data from bench scale tests with data from instrumented mannequin tests confirm the superiority of the cylindrical device in capturing the effects of both thermal shrinkage and fabric integrity.
机译:测量纺织品材料的热防护性能的基准测试不能捕获热收缩的影响,这主要是由于测试设备的平面几何形状。下面按照几种协议对防护服中常用的单层织物的性能进行了比较,包括使用新的圆筒形设备以及标准的和改进的ASTM,CGSB和ISO程序,在两者之间有6.35毫米的气隙。面料和传感器。测量达到二级燃烧标准的时间和传感器记录到24℃温升的时间。与其他测试相比,使用圆柱形设备进行测量时,收缩的织物降低了热保护性能。双向方差分析表明,尽管各个织物之间的相关度量有显着差异,但这些差异的性质和程度取决于所使用的测试。单向方差分析表明,每种方法在织物之间有所区别。但是,在大多数织物与传感器接触的测试中,最重的织物是最具防护性的。在包含织物和传感器之间的空间的测试中,使用圆柱形设备的测试在收缩的较轻织物和不收缩的较轻织物之间的区别最大。实验室规模测试数据与仪器化人体模型测试数据的回归分析证实了圆柱型设备在捕获热收缩和织物完整性方面的优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fire and materials》 |2002年第5期|p.207-213|共7页
  • 作者

    E.M. Crown; J.D. Dale; E. Bitner;

  • 作者单位

    302 Human Ecology Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2N1, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 其他市政工程及公用设备;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:12:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号