首页> 外文期刊>Fire Engineering >Firefighter Casualties: When 'Old-School Firefighting' Doesn't Work
【24h】

Firefighter Casualties: When 'Old-School Firefighting' Doesn't Work

机译:消防人员伤亡:“老派消防”不起作用时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From time to time, You hear the phrase "old-School Firefighting" and the need to return to our roots-I.e., hard-nosed, get-down-and-dirty, get-in-there-at-all-costs firefighting. Although many times this approach is warranted, failing to recognize when it is not warranted can and has cost firefighter lives. A cavalier approach to structural firefighting all the time, every time, displays a gross misunderstanding of risk management and usually results in more casualties than are acceptable (and none are acceptable!). No firefighter is tougher than a fire, a collapsing building, misbehaving electricity, or a moving vehicle. Your job as an officer is to keep your subordinates from testing that theory.
机译:您会不时听到“老派消防”一词,还需要回到我们的根基上,即刻薄,卑鄙,肮脏,无所不包的消防。尽管很多时候都可以采用这种方法,但是如果不能及时识别这种方法,则可能会导致消防员丧生。每次在结构性消防中总是采用高明的方法,这会显示出对风险管理的严重误解,并且通常会导致人员伤亡超过可接受的程度(而且任何情况都不可接受!)。没有消防员比火,建筑物倒塌,电力不正常或车辆行驶更强大。作为军官,您的工作是防止下属测试该理论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fire Engineering》 |2010年第3期|105-106108-113|共8页
  • 作者

    ANTHONY AVILLO;

  • 作者单位

    North Hudson Regional (NJ) Fire & Rescue;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:29:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号