首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review
【24h】

Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review

机译:失效模式下的风险评估方法及影响分析:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a risk assessment tool that mitigates potential failures in systems, processes, designs or services and has been used in a wide range of industries. The conventional risk priority number (RPN) method has been criticized to have many deficiencies and various risk priority models have been proposed in the literature to enhance the performance of FMEA. However, there has been no literature review on this topic. In this study, we reviewed 75 FMEA papers published between 1992 and 2012 in the international journals and categorized them according to the approaches used to overcome the limitations of the conventional RPN method. The intention of this review is to address the following three questions: (i) Which shortcomings attract the most attention? (ii) Which approaches are the most popular? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? The answers to these questions will give an indication of current trends in research and the best direction for future research in order to further address the known deficiencies associated with the traditional FMEA.
机译:故障模式和影响分析(FMEA)是一种风险评估工具,可减轻系统,流程,设计或服务中的潜在故障,并且已在许多行业中使用。批评了传统的风险优先级数字(RPN)方法存在许多缺陷,并且在文献中提出了各种风险优先级模型以增强FMEA的性能。但是,尚未对此主题进行文献综述。在这项研究中,我们回顾了1992年至2012年在国际期刊上发表的75篇FMEA论文,并根据克服常规RPN方法局限性的方法对它们进行了分类。这次审查的目的是解决以下三个问题:(i)哪些缺点最受关注? (ii)哪种方法最受欢迎? (iii)方法是否不足?这些问题的答案将指示当前的研究趋势以及未来研究的最佳方向,以进一步解决与传统FMEA相关的已知缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号