首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: The example of the planning phase of the At Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal
【24h】

The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: The example of the planning phase of the At Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal

机译:倡导联盟在项目实施过程中的作用:“在家/ Chez Soi”项目在蒙特利尔处理无家可归问题的规划阶段的示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyzed the planning process (summer 2008 to fall 2009) of a Montreal project that offers housing and community follow-up to homeless people with mental disorders, with or without substance abuse disorders. With the help of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), advocacy groups that were able to navigate a complex intervention implementation process were identified. In all, 25 people involved in the Montreal At Home/Chez Soi project were surveyed through interviews (n = 18) and a discussion group (n = 7). Participant observations and documentation (minutes and correspondence) were also used for the analysis. The start-up phase of the At Home/Chez may be broken down into three separate periods qualified respectively as "honeymoon;" "clash of cultures;" and "acceptance & commitment". In each of the planning phases of the At Home/Chez Soi project in Montreal, at least two advocacy coalitions were in confrontation about their specific belief systems concerning solutions to address the recurring homelessness social problem, while a third, more moderate one contributed in rallying most key actors under specified secondary aspects. The study confirms the importance of policy brokers in achieving compromises acceptable to all advocacy coalitions.
机译:这项研究分析了蒙特利尔项目的规划过程(2008年夏季至2009年秋季),该项目为患有或不患有药物滥用疾病的无家可归者提供住房和社区跟进服务。在倡导联盟框架(ACF)的帮助下,确定了能够驾驭复杂的干预措施实施过程的倡导小组。通过访谈(n = 18)和讨论组(n = 7)对参与“蒙特利尔在家/ Ches Soi”项目的25个人进行了调查。参加者的观察和记录(会议记录和信件)也用于分析。在家/ Chez的启动阶段可以分为三个单独的阶段,分别称为“蜜月”; “文化冲突;”和“接受与承诺”。在蒙特利尔的“在家/ Ches Soi”项目的每个规划阶段中,至少有两个倡导联盟在针对解决重复出现的无家可归者社会问题的解决方案的特定信仰体系方面存在对抗,而第三个更温和的倡导联盟在集会中做出了贡献指定次要方面的大多数关键角色。该研究证实了政策经纪人在实现所有倡导联盟可以接受的折衷方案中的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Evaluation and program planning》 |2014年第8期|42-49|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4H 1R3;

    Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4H 1R3;

    Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine Laval University, 1050, avenue de la Medecine, Quebec, Quebec, Canada GIV 0A6;

    School of Social Work, Sherbrooke University, 2500, Boulevard de l'Universite, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1K 2R1;

    Centre Dollard-Cormier, University Institute on Dependences, 950 de Louvain, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2M 2E8;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Implementation process; Coalitions; Mental health; Homelessness;

    机译:实施过程;联盟;精神健康;无家可归;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号