首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations
【24h】

A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations

机译:对系统概念图的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify, summarize, and synthesize all doctoral dissertations completed using Trochim's concept mapping methodology between 1985 and 2014. A comprehensive search produced.a set of 108 eligible dissertations; of which 104 were available as full-text or hard copy. The studies were coded on 77 variables, which were summarized in descriptive analyses. The dissertations were conducted in a wide variety of topic areas and completed at 35 different universities in the US and Canada. On comparable variables, the results were similar to two prior syntheses (Trochim,1993; Rosas & Kane, 2012). The mean multidimensional scaling analysis stress value for 96 concept maps was 0.26 with a standard deviation of 0.05. Cumulative rates of dissertation completion and resulting citations of the dissertations and any resulting articles were plotted over the study period. Reliability and validity were considered in most studies but formally assessed in a minority of cases. The review concludes with a summary of findings and thoughts about future studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是识别,总结和综合使用Trochim的概念图方法在1985年至2014年之间完成的所有博士学位论文。进行了全面的搜索。产生了一组108篇合格的论文。其中有104篇以全文本或印刷本提供。研究对77个变量进行了编码,这些变量在描述性分析中进行了总结。论文在广泛的主题领域中进行,并在美国和加拿大的35所不同大学中完成。在可比较的变量上,结果类似于两个先前的合成(Trochim,1993; Rosas&Kane,2012)。 96个概念图的平均多维比例分析应力值是0.26,标准差是0.05。在研究期内绘制了论文完成的累计速率,论文的最终引用率以及任何由此产生的文章。大多数研究都考虑了信度和效度,但在少数情况下进行了正式评估。回顾总结了对未来研究的发现和想法。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号