首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >Clarifying differences in viewpoints between multiple healthcare professionals during discharge planning assessments when discharging patients from a long-term care hospital to home
【24h】

Clarifying differences in viewpoints between multiple healthcare professionals during discharge planning assessments when discharging patients from a long-term care hospital to home

机译:澄清在从长期护理医院到家中征收患者时多重医疗保健专业人员之间的观点差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Comprehensive discharge planning provided by interprofessional collaboration is critical for discharging patients from hospitals to home. For effective interprofessional discharge planning, the evaluation that clarifies the differences in assessment viewpoints between various healthcare professionals is needed. This study aimed to clarify the assessment viewpoints of multiple healthcare professional groups when discharging patients from a long-term care hospital (LTCH) to home. We reviewed 102 medical records from an LTCH in Japan, extracted descriptions of discharge planning assessments written by 3 doctors, 13 nurses, 3 physical therapists, 13 care workers, and 2 social workers, linked these to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and conducted the statistical analysis. Doctors and nurses significantly focused on "Body Functions". Physical therapists and care workers significantly focused on "Activities and Participation". Social workers significantly focused on "Environmental Factors". We also identified the factors less or missing from assessments in the clinical field of the LTCH. Our findings could be contributed as a base of knowledge to foster a better understanding of different healthcare professionals' assessment viewpoints. The further development of comprehensive discharge planning assessment tools, service programs, and research on discharge planning methods that could contribute to effective interprofessional discharge planning is needed.
机译:思想协作提供的综合排放规划对于从医院抵消家庭的患者至关重要。对于有效的竞争排放规划,需要澄清各种医疗保健专业人员之间评估观点差异的评估。本研究旨在澄清在从长期护理医院(LTCH)患者到家中的患者时澄清多个医疗保健专业团体的评估观点。我们审查了来自日本的LTCH的102次医疗记录,提取了3名医生,13名护士,3名物理治疗师,13名护理工作者和2名社会工作者所写的排放计划评估的描述将这些联系在一起的运作,残疾和健康的国际分类,并进行统计分析。医生和护士在“身体功能”中显着聚焦。物理治疗师和护理工作者显着关注“活动和参与”。社会工作者显着关注“环境因素”。我们还确定了LTCH临床领域的评估中少或缺少的因素。我们的调查结果可以作为促进对不同医疗专业人员评估观点的更好理解的知识基础。需要综合排放计划评估工具,服务计划和对可能导致有效侦查排放规划的排放计划方法的研究进一步发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Evaluation and program planning》 |2020年第10期|101848.1-101848.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Community Based Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Community Based Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Med Corp Hakuyoukai 2125 Hishikarimaeme Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Psychosomat Internal Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Psychosomat Internal Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Int Isl & Community Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Int Isl & Community Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

    Kagoshima Univ Dept Community Based Med Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka Kagoshima Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Discharge planning assessment; Interprofessional work; Multiple viewpoints; Long-term care hospital; ICF;

    机译:排放计划评估;侦查工作;多个观点;长期护理医院;ICF;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号