首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >Looking beneath the surface of a preceptor-training programme through a realist evaluation
【24h】

Looking beneath the surface of a preceptor-training programme through a realist evaluation

机译:通过现实主义评估观察预先培训计划的表面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

South Africa's department of health devoted themselves to the clinical nursing education and training model, which indorses preceptors as essential stakeholders to promote competence in students. A preceptor-training programme was developed that build on this model and implemented through an intervention. The initial programme theory hypothesised that trained preceptors would promote support and develop competence in students in comparison to untrained preceptors. Results showed a poor outcome because few preceptors participated and a high student attrition rates. The authors then posed the question "Why did the preceptorship training programme not work?" This article offers insight into the context, mechanism, and outcome of the preceptor-training programme through a realist evaluation. Reflective field notes, gathered during the intervention, were used and gave insight regarding how, for whom, and under which circumstances the programme could work and offered a refined programme theory for preceptorship. The main conclusion drawn showed that a preceptor-training programme alone is not the sole determining factor to ensure preceptor's motivation to transfer their learning; a systems approach, ensuring the effectiveness of the programme, should be followed. Reflection on findings indicated the implementation context as a major determining factor of the training programme.
机译:南非的健康部门致力于临床护理教育和培训模式,这些模式以促进学生促进能力的重要利益相关者。先导培训计划是在此模型上建立并通过干预实施的。初步计划理论假设训练有素的备注者将促进与未经训练的预先训练的人的支持和发展能力。结果表明了较差的结果,因为少量少数备忘录和高学生的磨损率。作者然后提出了这个问题“为什么原施联培训计划不起作用?”本文通过现实主义评估提供了对预先培训计划的背景,机制和结果的洞察力。在干预期间聚集的反思性领域笔记被使用,并对何种方式进行了解,并在哪些情况下,该计划可以工作,并提供精制的辐射计划理论。主要结论绘制的主要结论表明,单独的预先训练计划不是唯一的确定因素,以确保预先转移他们的学习的动力;应遵循系统方法,确保程序的有效性。关于调查结果的反思表明了实现上下文作为培训计划的主要决定因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Evaluation and program planning》 |2019年第4期|195-203|共9页
  • 作者

    Hugo Lizemari; Botma Yvonne;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Free State Sch Nursing Fac Hlth Sci ZA-9300 Bloemfontein South Africa;

    Univ Free State Sch Nursing Fac Hlth Sci ZA-9300 Bloemfontein South Africa;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:52:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号