首页> 外文期刊>European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire >Sabbatian Charlatans: the first Jewish cosmopolitans   1. This paper is based on a chapter of my book, The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement 1755-1816, University of Pennsylvania Press (forthcoming). View all notes
【24h】

Sabbatian Charlatans: the first Jewish cosmopolitans   1. This paper is based on a chapter of my book, The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement 1755-1816, University of Pennsylvania Press (forthcoming). View all notes

机译:Sabbatian Charlatans:第一个犹太世界主义者– 1。本文基于我的书《混合的多重性:雅各布·弗兰克和1755-1816年的法兰克运动》一书的一章,宾夕法尼亚大学出版社(即将出版)。查看所有笔记

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper utilises the concept of the charlatan in order to analyse the fortunes of two Jewish ‘false messiahs’, Wolf Eibeschütz and Jacob Frank. As the Encycopédie put it, charlatanry is ‘the vice of him who strives to recommend himself, or things belonging to him, as being endowed with imaginary qualities’. While charlatans obviously existed in every age and ‘every class had its charlatans,’ in some periods charlatanry was particularly prominent and widespread. Thus, charlatanry was especially likely to appear in the periods of social, cultural, and scientific change, in which empirical research out ran theory, and the rapid development of technology eluded the abilities of its conceptualisation, let alone the possibilities of explaining it to the general public. In other words, charlatanry was likely to hold sway whenever the ‘fringe of the inexplicable’ became especially large, and the gap between those in the know and the rest of the population particularly wide. The mid-eighteenth century was the golden age of European charlatanry. Members of the pan-European guild of the itinerant charlatans drifted from court to court, rotated from salon to salon, exchanging experiences, swapping mistresses, and underwriting each other's false bills of exchange. The most important representatives of this type were contemporaries and often knew each other. The last part of the paper discusses contacts between Jacob Frank and Giacomo Casanova.View full textDownload full textKeywordsJewish, Cosmopolitanism, Sabbatai, Eibeschütz, alchemy, Casanova, charlatanRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2010.481930
机译:本文利用了骗子的概念来分析两个犹太“假弥赛亚”的命运,他们是沃尔夫·埃比斯切茨和雅各布·弗兰克。正如Encycopédie所说的那样,骗子是“努力推荐自己或属于他的事物具有虚构品质的他的副手”。虽然各种年龄的人都有明显的骗子,而且“每个阶层都有它的骗子”,但在某些时期,骗子尤其突出和广泛。因此,骗术特别有可能出现在社会,文化和科学变革的时期,在这一时期中,实证研究超出了理论的范围,而技术的飞速发展却掩盖了其概念化的能力,更不用说向人类解释它的可能性了。公众。换句话说,每当“莫名其妙的边缘”变得特别大,并且知识渊博的人与其他人口之间的鸿沟特别大时,盗窃案就很可能会占据主导地位。 18世纪中叶是欧洲舞弊的黄金时代。泛欧巡回骗子协会的成员从一个法院流到另一个法院,从一家沙龙轮流到一家沙龙,交流经验,交换情妇,并为对方的假汇票包销。这种类型最重要的代表是当代人,并且经常彼此了解。本文的最后一部分讨论了雅各布·弗兰克与贾科莫·卡萨诺瓦之间的联系。查看全文下载全文关键词netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2010.481930

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号