首页> 外文期刊>European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire >Passions and the early Italian Enlightenment: human nature and Vivere Civile in the thought of Gregorio Caloprese
【24h】

Passions and the early Italian Enlightenment: human nature and Vivere Civile in the thought of Gregorio Caloprese

机译:热情与意大利早期启蒙运动:格雷戈里奥·卡洛普雷塞思想中的人性与平民主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

‘Passions’ have been described as the opposite of reason. There is no place for forming them in the Age of Reason or the Enlightenment. Passions stood for self-love and self-interest at the heart of political philosophy in the beginning of the commercial era. The relation between the passions and the early-enlightened philosophy is closer than has often been thought. This article focuses on the example of the doctor, philosopher and literary critic Gregorio Caloprese (1650-1715), who is considered to be one of the most influential representatives of the early Italian Enlightenment. Caloprese is usually described as a Cartesian enlightened thinker who attempted to emphasise the rational part of human nature. Contemporaries, however, already regarded his conception of human nature as an example of the introduction of early-modern scientific accounts of processes of human understanding, which have as a starting point the perceptions of the senses, producing the motions of the body. These non-rational parts of the process of human understanding were more important to his philosophy than is often argued. They were part of a programme for intellectual renewal that drove the reformulation of Catholic philosophy from the obsolete scholastic intellectual tradition in Naples, in which Caloprese had a crucial part. This essay examines the development of Caloprese's views on passions in their historical context and their significance for his early-enlightened interest.View full textDownload full textKeywordstheories of the passions, human nature, happiness, sociability, civil philosophy, Epicureanism, early-Enlightenment, Naples, ItalyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13507480903511942
机译:“激情”被描述为理性的反面。在理性时代或启蒙时代没有形成它们的地方。在商业时代开始之初,激情代表着自爱和自利,是政治哲学的核心。激情与早期开明的哲学之间的关系比人们通常认为的要紧密。本文以医生,哲学家和文学评论家Gregorio Caloprese(1650-1715)为例,他被认为是意大利早期启蒙运动最有影响力的代表之一。卡洛普雷塞通常被描述为笛卡尔的开明思想家,他试图强调人性的理性部分。然而,同时代的人已经将他对人性的概念作为引入人类理解过程的早期现代科学描述的一个例子,这些描述以感官的感知为起点,产生了人体的运动。人类理解过程中的这些非理性部分对他的哲学而言,比通常所说的更为重要。它们是知识更新计划的一部分,该计划促使天主教哲学从那不勒斯已过时的学术知识传统中重新制定,而在那不勒斯中,卡尔洛普雷塞起着至关重要的作用。本文探讨了卡洛普雷塞关于激情的观点在其历史背景下的发展及其对他的早期开悟兴趣的意义。查看全文下载全文激情,人性,幸福,社交性,公民哲学,伊壁鸠鲁主义,早期启蒙运动,那不勒斯的关键词理论,意大利相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13507480903511942

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号