首页> 外文期刊>European journal of political economy >Election systems, the 'beauty premium' in politics, and the beauty of dissent
【24h】

Election systems, the 'beauty premium' in politics, and the beauty of dissent

机译:选举制度,政治中的“美容优惠”,以及异议的美丽

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We ask three questions. First, do election systems differ in how they translate physical attractiveness of candidates into electoral success? Second, do political parties strategically exploit the "beauty premium" when deciding on which candidates to nominate, and, third, do elected MPs use their beauty premium to reap some independence from their party? Using the German election system that combines first-past-the-post election with party-list proportional representation, our results show that plurality elections provide more scope for translating physical attractiveness into electoral success than proportional representation. Whether political parties strategically use the beauty premium to optimize their electoral objectives is less clear. Physically attractive MPs, however, allow themselves to dissent more often, i.e. they vote more often against the party line than their less attractive peers.
机译:我们问三个问题。首先,选举系统的不同之处在于如何将候选人的物理吸引力转化为选举成功?第二,政党做战略性地利用“美容溢价”,当决定提名的候选人,第三次选择的议员使用他们的美容溢价来获得一些独立的党派?使用德国选举制度,将首次前任选举结合在一起与聚会列表比例表示,我们的结果表明,多个选举提供更多范围,以便将身体吸引力转化为选举成功而不是比例代表性。政党是否战略性地利用美容溢价来优化其选举目标不太清楚。然而,物理上有吸引力的国会议员允许自己更常见,即,他们比他们更有吸引力的同龄人更常见的党内投反对票。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号