首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Can Cross-Border Bargaining Coordination Work? Analytical Reflections and Evidence from the Metal Industry in Germany and Austria
【24h】

Can Cross-Border Bargaining Coordination Work? Analytical Reflections and Evidence from the Metal Industry in Germany and Austria

机译:跨境谈判协调可以工作吗?来自德国和奥地利的金属行业的分析思考和证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To contain downward pressures on labour standards, Europe's unions have attempted to coordinate their bargaining strategies. Little is known about whether such coordination can actually work. Analytical accounts have deduced its feasibility from national experiences with decentralized forms of coordination, while empirically only anecdotal evidence on its effectiveness is available. This article contributes to the analytical debate by pointing out the different logics of national and transnational bargaining coordination. Empirically, it tests the prospects for cross-border coordination by analyzing how Austrian collective agreements in the metal industry related to their German counterparts from 1969 to 2003. We conclude by discussing the implications for EU-level bargaining coordination.
机译:为了控制劳工标准的下降压力,欧洲工会试图协调其讨价还价策略。对于这种协调能否真正起作用还鲜为人知。分析性说明从分散形式的协调的国家经验中推论出其可行性,而从经验上仅可获得有关其有效性的传闻证据。本文通过指出国家和跨国谈判协调的不同逻辑,为分析辩论做出了贡献。从经验上讲,它通过分析1969年至2003年奥地利在金属行业的集体协议与德国同行之间的关系来检验跨境协调的前景。最后,我们讨论了对欧盟一级议价协调的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号