首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands
【24h】

Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands

机译:集体协议中的社会风险保护:来自荷兰的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To what extent can collective bargaining compensate for a decline in or absence of welfare state protection against social risks? In this article, we use a comprehensive collective agreement database to analyse social risk coverage in the Netherlands from 1995 to 2009. We compare two forms of social risk, disability and work-life arrangements, analysing the share of collective agreements that offer these arrangements across time. Our results show that collective bargaining differs across the public and private sector but is similar at different levels of bargaining. In general, our findings demonstrate that collective agreements often compensate for declining welfare state coverage or a lack of state provision.As a result, the findings presented here suggest occupational welfare, in the form of collective bargaining, is an important component of welfare provision that is oftentimes overlooked in the current welfare state literature.
机译:集体谈判可以在多大程度上弥补福利国家针对社会风险的保护程度的下降或缺乏?在本文中,我们使用一个全面的集体协议数据库来分析1995年至2009年荷兰的社会风险覆盖率。我们比较两种形式的社会风险,即残疾和工作生活安排,分析提供这些安排的集体协议的份额时间。我们的结果表明,集体谈判在公共部门和私营部门之间是不同的,但是在不同的谈判水平上是相似的。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,集体协议通常可以弥补福利国家覆盖率下降或缺乏国家规定的后果,因此,本文提出的研究结果表明,以集体谈判的形式出现的职业福利是福利规定的重要组成部分,在当前的福利国家文献中常常被忽视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号