首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Welfare institutions and the mobilization of consent: Union responses to labour market activation policies in France and the Netherlands
【24h】

Welfare institutions and the mobilization of consent: Union responses to labour market activation policies in France and the Netherlands

机译:福利机构和同意动员:法国和荷兰工会对劳动力市场激活政策的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Trade union responses to labour market activation policies are central to any assessment of their attitudes and strategies in the face of contemporary welfare state restructuring. Yet this issue has to date been the object of only limited theorization and minimal empirical investigation. We attempt to remedy this. Drawing on existing literatures in different disciplines, we first outline the theoretical grounds for predicting union opposition to or support for labour market activation measures. We then explore these competing arguments through a reconstruction and comparison of the development of union positions on labour market activation over time in two countries, France and the Netherlands. The case studies suggest that union stances on these policies are not straightforwardly determined by the structure of labour market institutions; considerations regarding the impact of activation initiatives on the role of unions in the institutions of the welfare state play a major role in mobilizing their consent or dissent.
机译:面对当代福利国家的结构调整,工会对劳动力市场激活政策的反应对于评估其态度和策略至关重要。然而,迄今为止,这个问题只是有限的理论化和最少的经验研究的对象。我们试图对此进行补救。我们首先利用不同学科中的现有文献,首先概述预测工会反对或支持劳动力市场激活措施的理论基础。然后,我们通过对两个国家(法国和荷兰)随着时间的推移在劳动力市场激活方面工会立场的发展进行重建和比较,来探讨这些竞争性论点。案例研究表明,工会对这些政策的立场不是直接由劳动力市场机构的结构决定的。关于激活计划对工会在福利国家机构中的作用的影响的考虑在动员其同意或异议中起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号