首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Grief and Loss
【24h】

Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Grief and Loss

机译:哀悼大自然:希望是生态悲痛与损失的核心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If C.S. Lewis' A Grief Observed (1961) can be considered an account of a lost human relationship, then Cunsolo and Landman's Mourning Nature forms a posthuman, but nonetheless personal, examination of the losses of relationships with plants, animals, and even entire ecosystems-an ecological grief observed. In this regard, one of the motivations for this book was Cunsolo's interviews with Inuit residents who experienced profound sadness and despair at the changes in the landscape brought by climate change. Beyond this, each of the contributors to Mourning Nature brought a variety of written, auditory, visual, and meaning-making experiences to their acts of mourning wild nature. The parallels to Lewis' book end here because the authors are not writing about their unique losses, although their accounts may be both personal and compelling. Instead, this book moves beyond the personal and human to the posthuman perspective. In different but recurring ways, the authors explored our ethical obligations to: 1) consider the subjectivities of plants and animals; 2) find ways to mourn the losses of place, land- and waterscapes, and the living things that occupy them; and 3) transform the intense emotions of grief mourning into productive and collective action that can reduce ecological losses. In this way, "mourning nature" is less about an individual, perhaps selfish response to loss, but something that is a testimony to both the scale and the value of what has been lost and a motive for pursuing preventative actions together.
机译:如果将CS Lewis的《悲痛的观察》(A Grief Observed,1961)视为人际关系丧失的原因,那么Cunsolo和Landman的《哀悼自然》就构成了对人类,植物,动物乃至整个生态系统关系丧失的后人类(尽管如此)的个人研究。 -观察到生态悲痛。在这方面,本书的动机之一是Cunsolo对因纽特人的采访,他们因气候变化带来的景观变化而深感悲伤和绝望。除此之外,每个哀悼大自然的贡献者都为哀悼大自然的行为带来了各种书面,听觉,视觉和意义创造体验。刘易斯书的相似之处到这里就结束了,因为尽管他们的叙述可能既是个人的又是令人信服的,但作者并未写出他们独特的损失。取而代之的是,这本书超越了个人和人类的视角,转向了后人类的视角。作者以不同但又反复出现的方式探索了我们的道德义务:1)考虑动植物的主观性; 2)找到哀悼失去的地方,土地和水景以及所占据的生物的方法; 3)将悲痛的强烈情绪转变为可以减少生态损失的生产性和集体行动。这样,“哀悼性质”就不是针对个人,也许是对损失的自私反应,而是某种东西证明了损失的规模和价值,以及共同采取预防行动的动机。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics & the environment》 |2018年第1期|79-86|共8页
  • 作者

    ALAN E. STEWART;

  • 作者单位

    the University of Georgia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:19:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号