首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, Place and Environment >Producing Conservation and Community in South Africa
【24h】

Producing Conservation and Community in South Africa

机译:在南非生产保护区和社区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper was largely written by the General Manager for People and Conservation in South African National Parks (SANParks), with a contribution by an anthropologist studying the post-apartheid transition of Kruger National Park. Our purpose is to engage in an ongoing discussion aimed at equitable best practice and community empowerment in social research and protected areas by bringing together context informed, insider (Masuku Van Damme) and outsider (Meskell) perspectives. It is not intended to offer a conclusive account of people and park dynamics in SANParks. The paper begins with an overview of the establishment of protected areas in South Africa. It then traces conservation philosophies and management principles from 1900 to the present. We then examine the move towards community involvement with conservation areas, outlining the impacts of the World Conservation Strategy and the Brundtland Report. This leads into a discussion of the development of Social Ecology within SANParks, evaluating the successes and failures of consultative efforts with indigenous communities. Lastly, we describe recent moves to include cultural heritage and indigenous knowledge into the programmatics of park management.
机译:该论文主要由南非国家公园(SANParks)的人类与自然保护总经理(National and Conservation)撰写,并由人类学家对研究克鲁格国家公园的种族隔离后过渡做出了贡献。我们的目的是通过结合上下文相关的知情者,内部人士(Masuku Van Damme)和外部人士(Meskell)的观点,进行持续的讨论,以期在社会研究和保护区实现公平的最佳实践和社区赋权。它并不旨在提供有关SANParks中人员和公园动态的结论性说明。本文首先概述了南非保护区的建立。然后追溯了1900年至今的保护理念和管理原则。然后,我们研究了社区参与保护区的过程,概述了《世界保护战略》和《布伦特兰报告》的影响。这导致对SANParks内部社会生态学发展的讨论,评估与土著社区协商工作的成败。最后,我们描述了将文化遗产和本土知识纳入公园管理计划的最新举措。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号