首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, Place and Environment >A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence: Comment on Felman and Turner's 'Why Not NIMBY?'
【24h】

A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence: Comment on Felman and Turner's 'Why Not NIMBY?'

机译:呼吁澄清并审查经验证据:评论费尔曼和特纳的《为什么不灵活?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This response contributes to Feldman and Turner's interesting discussion in two ways: firstly, it provides some clarity on the definition of the term 'NIMBY'; and, secondly, it incorporates some of the actual empirical evidence of why people support and oppose renewable energy. Feldman and Turner's paper is a welcome and valuable addition to the discussions on this topic. Support and opposition to renewable energy developments— particularly wind farms—has received extensive attention from across the social sciences. From the mid-1990s onwards, protests accompanying the development of wind farms attracted increasing interest. This early work tended to problematise opposition and sought ways to explain and overcome it.
机译:这种回应在两个方面促进了Feldman和Turner的有趣的讨论:首先,它使术语“ NIMBY”的定义更加清晰。其次,它结合了人们为什么支持和反对可再生能源的一些实际经验证据。 Feldman和Turner的论文是对该主题讨论的欢迎和宝贵的补充。对可再生能源发展(尤其是风电场)的支持和反对受到了整个社会科学的广泛关注。从1990年代中期开始,伴随风电场发展的抗议活动引起了越来越多的关注。这项早期工作往往使反对派成为问题,并寻求解释和克服反对派的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, Place and Environment》 |2010年第3期|p.313-316|共4页
  • 作者

    CLAIRE HAGGETT;

  • 作者单位

    Lecturer in Sociology of Sustainability, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LP;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:22:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号