首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, policy and environment >Hope and Fear: The Theological Side of Framing Environmental Change
【24h】

Hope and Fear: The Theological Side of Framing Environmental Change

机译:希望与恐惧:构筑环境变化的神学方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The public response to climate change highlights a long-standing issue in environmentalism: scientific information, public policy, and individual actions tend to work independently of (and unfortunately often at odds with) one another. Why is this so? In 'What will it mean to be green?', Cheryl Hall (2013) highlights research on framing environmental issues to diagnose the root of the problem. She writes, 'More than anything, what matters is how information is interpreted, what meaning it holds for people' (Hall, 2013). Scientific literacy and information is not enough; understanding only emerges when a narrative context serves to illuminate meaning. As philosophical hermeneutics suggests, stories matter. What is more, stories are unavoidable-understanding and action both emerge from a horizon of narration.
机译:公众对气候变化的应对突出了环境主义中的一个长期问题:科学信息,公共政策和个人行动往往相互独立(不幸的是经常彼此矛盾)。为什么会这样呢? Cheryl Hall(2013)在“绿色意味着什么?”一书中着重介绍了研究框架环境问题以诊断问题根源的研究。她写道:“最重要的是,信息的解释方式,信息对人们的意义”(Hall,2013年)。科学的素养和信息还不够。只有当叙事语境用来阐明意义时,才出现理解。正如哲学解释学所暗示的那样,故事很重要。更重要的是,故事是不可避免的理解,而行动都来自叙述的视野。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, policy and environment》 |2013年第2期|152-155|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ohio Northern University, 525 South Main Street, Ada, Ohio, 45817, USA;

    Mercyhurst University, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号