首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, policy and environment >Uncertainty, Risk and Ecosystem Management
【24h】

Uncertainty, Risk and Ecosystem Management

机译:不确定性,风险与生态系统管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ronald Sandier (2013) argues that rapid anthropogenic climate change (CC) undermines traditional ecosystem management goals. According to Sandier, this implies that ecological restoration should play a decreased role in future ecosystem management, while reserve oriented strategies might remain viable as long as we change the goals for ecosystem management in the light of CC. While I am overall sympathetic to Sandler's argument and agree with his analysis of CC's impact on existing ecosystem management strategies and goals, I want to critically highlight some shortcomings of Sandler's argument. In particular, Sandier seems to deal in his own positive proposal inadequately with the issues of risk and uncertainty, which play a crucial role in his argument against existing management strategies and goals.
机译:罗纳德·桑迪尔(Ronald Sandier,2013)认为,人为的快速气候变化(CC)破坏了传统的生态系统管理目标。桑迪尔认为,这意味着生态恢复应该在未来的生态系统管理中发挥越来越小的作用,而只要我们根据CC改变生态系统管理的目标,以储备为导向的战略就可能仍然可行。尽管我总体上支持桑德勒的论点,并且同意他对CC对现有生态系统管理策略和目标的影响的分析,但我想批评地强调桑德勒论点的一些缺点。尤其是,桑迪耶(Sandier)似乎在处理自己的积极建议时并未充分考虑风险和不确定性问题,这在他反对现有管理策略和目标的论断中起着至关重要的作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, policy and environment》 |2013年第1期|22-25|共4页
  • 作者

    FABIAN SCHUPPERT;

  • 作者单位

    URPP Ethics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号