首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, policy and environment >Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare's Two-Level Utilitarianism
【24h】

Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare's Two-Level Utilitarianism

机译:人格,伦理与动物认知:将动物置于野兔的两级功利主义中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The insistence of utilitarian philosophers on the moral relevance of the fact that animals can suffer has made utilitarian moral thinking central to debates on animal ethics at least since Jeremy Bentham ([1823] 1879, pp. 310-311) argued that animals' apparent lack of the ability to speak or reason did not disqualify them from moral consideration. Gary Varner's Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition, an extended defense of, and elaboration on, R. M. Hare's specific version of utilitarianism, fits well into this tradition of utilitarian moral reasoning about animals. This book is worth reading for the numerous interesting philosophical contributions it makes to the literatures on animal ethics, personhood, and utilitarianism in general.
机译:至少从杰里米·边沁(Jeremy Bentham,[[1823] 1879,第310-311页)认为动物明显缺乏以来,功利主义哲学家坚持认为动物可能遭受痛苦这一事实在道德上具有关联性,这使得功利主义道德思维成为动物伦理学辩论的中心。语言能力或理性能力并没有使他们丧失道德考虑的资格。加里·瓦纳(Gary Varner)的《人格,伦理学和动物认知》,是对R. M. Hare的特定功利主义版本的扩展辩护和阐述,很适合这种关于动物的功利主义道德推理的传统。本书对动物伦理,人格和功利主义文学做出了许多有趣的哲学贡献,值得一读。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, policy and environment》 |2015年第2期|226-229|共4页
  • 作者

    Justin Moss;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, Philosophy Program University of South Dakota;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号