首页> 外文期刊>Estuaries and Coasts >Response of Tidal Creek Fish Communities to Dredging and Coastal Development Pressures in a Shallow-Water Estuary
【24h】

Response of Tidal Creek Fish Communities to Dredging and Coastal Development Pressures in a Shallow-Water Estuary

机译:浅水河口潮汐河鱼类群落对疏Dr和海岸发育压力的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To investigate the effects of dredging and associated development pressures (i.e., shoreline armoring, developed land use) on fish, three sets of paired dredged and undredged tidal creeks were surveyed within Lynnhaven River, Virginia. Fish species diversity, community abundance, biomass, and size structure were compared among creeks and related to watershed, shoreline, and physicochemical characteristics. Mean fish community characteristics (e.g., abundance) were similar among creeks; however, species-specific analysis revealed subtle differences. Species biomass differed between dredged and undredged creeks, though species abundance was similar. Turbidity highly influenced differences in species abundance among creeks, while organic matter, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and shoreline hardening may be influencing biomass patterns. The most recently dredged creek appeared to provide less suitable nursery habitat for some species than historically dredged creeks, suggesting initial adverse effects with eventual recovery. Protective measures, such as preservation of marshes, dredge depth, and time-of-year restrictions, may be moderating development and dredging pressures.
机译:为了调查疏and和相关的发展压力(即海岸线装甲,发达的土地利用)对鱼类的影响,在弗吉尼亚州林恩黑文河内调查了三对成对的疏ged和未疏的潮汐小溪。比较了小河中鱼类的物种多样性,群落丰富度,生物量和大小结构,并与流域,海岸线和理化特征有关。小河的平均鱼类群落特征(例如丰度)相似;但是,特定物种的分析显示出细微的差异。疏biomass小溪和疏red小溪之间的物种生物量有所不同,尽管物种丰富度相似。浑浊度在很大程度上影响着小河之间物种丰度的差异,而有机物,溶解氧,浑浊度和海岸线硬化可能会影响生物量的格局。最近疏dr的小溪似乎不像历史上疏ged的小溪那样为某些物种提供更适合的苗圃栖息地,这表明最初的不利影响最终得以恢复。保护措施,例如保护沼泽,疏edge深度和年度限制,可能会减轻发展和疏pressure压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号