首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Occupation-differential construct validity of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) psychological job demands scale with physical job demands items: a mixed methods research
【24h】

Occupation-differential construct validity of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) psychological job demands scale with physical job demands items: a mixed methods research

机译:职业内容问卷(JCQ)心理工作需求量表与身体工作需求项目的职业-差异构造效度:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The construct validity of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) psychological demands scale in relationship to physical demands has been inconsistent. This study aims to test quantitatively and qualitatively whether the scale validity differs by occupation. Hierarchical clustering analyses of 10 JCQ psychological and physical demands items were conducted in 61 occupations from two datasets: one of non-faculty workers at a university in the United States (6 occupations with 208 total workers) and the other of a Belgian working population (55 occupations with 13,039 total workers). The psychological and physical demands items overlapped in 13 of 61 occupation-stratified clustering analyses. Most of the overlaps occurred in physically-demanding occupations and involved the two psychological demands items, 'work fast' and 'work hard'. Generally, the scale reliability was low in such occupations. Additionally, interviews with eight university workers revealed that workers interpreted the two psychological demands items differently by the nature of their tasks. The scale validity was occupation-differential.
机译:工作需求量表(JCQ)的心理需求量表与身体需求之间的建构效度一直不一致。本研究旨在定量和定性地检验量表效度是否因职业而异。从两个数据集中对61个职业进行了10个JCQ心理和身体需求项目的分层聚类分析:一个是美国一所大学的非教职员工(6个职业,共有208名工人),另一个是比利时工作人口( 55个职业,共有13039名工人)。心理和身体需求项在61个职业分层聚类分析中的13个中重叠。大多数重叠发生在对身体有要求的职业中,涉及两个心理需求项:“快速工作”和“努力工作”。通常,在这样的职业中规模信度较低。此外,对八名大学工作人员的访谈显示,工作人员根据任务的性质对这两种心理需求项目的解释有所不同。量表效度是职业差异的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ergonomics》 |2012年第4期|p.425-439|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA,Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California Irvine, 5210 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, USA,Center for Women & Work, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA;

    Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA;

    Center for Women & Work, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA,Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 870 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA;

    Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California Irvine, 5210 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, USA;

    Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium;

    Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium;

    Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA,Center for Women & Work, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    clustering analysis; reliability; interview; the united states; belgium;

    机译:聚类分析;可靠性;面试美国;比利时;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:15:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号