...
首页> 外文期刊>Environments >Whose Fallacies Now?
【24h】

Whose Fallacies Now?

机译:现在谁的谬论?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Tim Leduc has presented a thoughtful account of problems within academia that have to be worked around by whoever promotes interdisciplinary themed approaches to learning. Environmental studies was one of the first to experience this, and it continues to do so, even though (or especially now) that the first programs are entering their fifth decade in Canadian and other universities. The institutional impediments come from deeply entrenched, highly specialized research and education programs organized into mutually isolated and competitive disciplines and professions. These are closely affiliated with the larger political economy that academia is designed to serve, and, as a consequence, that is supported by the privileged classes who dominate government, corporate, and other mainstream institutions.
机译:蒂姆·勒杜克(Tim Leduc)对学术界存在的问题进行了深思熟虑的论述,无论谁提倡跨学科主题的学习方法,都必须解决这些问题。环境研究是最早经历过这一过程的国家之一,并且即使在(或特别是现在)第一批课程进入加拿大和其他大学的第五个十年之时,环境研究仍在继续。体制上的障碍来自根深蒂固的,高度专业化的研究和教育计划,这些计划和组织了相互孤立和竞争的学科和专业。这些与学术界旨在服务的更大的政治经济学紧密相关,因此,这得到了统治政府,企业和其他主流机构的特权阶级的支持。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environments》 |2010年第2期|p.29-33|共5页
  • 作者

    George Francis;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Environment at the University of Waterloo;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号