首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Was Aldo Leopold a Pragmatist? Rescuing Leopold from the Imagination of Bryan Norton
【24h】

Was Aldo Leopold a Pragmatist? Rescuing Leopold from the Imagination of Bryan Norton

机译:Aldo Leopold是实用主义者吗?从布莱恩·诺顿的想象中拯救利奥波德

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aldo Leopold was a pragmatist in the vernacular sense of the word. Bryan G. Norton claims that Leopold was also heavily influenced by American Pragmatism, a formal school of philosophy. As evidence, Norton offers Leopold's misquotation of a definition of right (as truth) by political economist, A.T. Hadley, who was an admirer of the philosophy of William James. A search of Leopold's digitised literary remains reveals no other evidence that Leopold was directly influenced by any actual American Pragmatist or by Pragmatism (although he may have been indirectly influenced by Pragmatism early in his career). A 1923 reference, by Leopold, to Hadley and Hadley's putative definition of truth, cited by Norton, is dripping with irony. Leopold, as he matured philosophically, regarded a profound cultural shift from anthropocentric dominionism and consumerism to an evolutionary-ecological worldview and an associated non-anthropocentric 'land ethic' to be necessary for successful and sustainable conservation. Hadley espoused a brutal form of Social Darwinism and his philosophy, as expressed in the book of Hadley's that Norton cites, is politically reactionary, militaristic and unconcerned with conservation. Leopold's mature philosophy and Hadley's - far from consonant, as Norton claims - are diametrically opposed.
机译:奥尔多·利奥波德(Aldo Leopold)是白话语的实用主义者。布莱恩·诺顿(Bryan G. Norton)声称,利奥波德(Leopold)也受到正规哲学学校美国实用主义的严重影响。作为证据,诺顿提出了政治经济学家A.T.的利奥波德对权利(作为真理)定义的错误引用。哈德利(Hadley)是威廉·詹姆斯(William James)哲学的崇拜者。对利奥波德的数字化文学遗迹的搜索没有发现其他证据,表明利奥波德直接受到任何实际美国实用主义者或实用主义的影响(尽管他可能在其职业生涯的早期就间接受到过实用主义的影响)。利奥波德(Leopold)在1923年提到诺顿(Norton)引用的哈德利(Hadley)和哈德利(Hadley)对真理的推定定义时,真是讽刺。利奥波德(Leopold)在哲学上日趋成熟,他认为,从人类中心的统治和消费主义向进化生态世界观的深刻文化转变以及与之相关的非人类中心的“土地伦理”对于成功和可持续的保护是必不可少的。正如诺顿所引用的哈德利著作中所表达的那样,哈德利拥护一种残酷形式的社会达尔文主义及其哲学,这在政治上是反动的,军国主义的,并且与保护无关。利奥波德(Leopold)的成熟哲学和哈德利(Hadley)的哲学-就像诺顿所说的那样,并非辅音-截然相反。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Values》 |2009年第4期|453-486|共34页
  • 作者单位

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

    University of North Texas Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies P.O. Box 310920 Denton, TX 76203-0920, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hadley; conservation; ecology; evolution; nonanthropocentric;

    机译:哈德利保护;生态;演化;非人类中心;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:58:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号