首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry >THE USE AND MISUSE OF BIOMARKERS IN ECOTOXICOLOGY
【24h】

THE USE AND MISUSE OF BIOMARKERS IN ECOTOXICOLOGY

机译:生物标志物在生态毒理学中的使用和滥用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Substantial efforts have been devoted to developing and applying biomarkers for use in ecotoxicology. These efforts have resulted partly from a desire for early warning indicators that respond before measurable effects on individuals and populations occur and partly as an aid to identifying the causes of observed population- and community-level effects. Whereas older biomarkers focused on measures of organism physiology or biochemistry, advances in molecular biology are extending the biomarker philosophy to the level of the genes (i.e., ecotoxicogenomics). However, the extent to which biomarkers are able to provide unambiguous and ecologically relevant indicators of exposure to or effects of toxicants remains highly controversial. In the present paper, we briefly discuss the application of biomarkers in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment, and we provide examples of how they have been applied. We conclude that although biomarkers can be helpful for gaining insight regarding the mechanisms causing observed effects of chemicals on whole-organism performance and may, in some cases, provide useful indicators of exposure, individual biomarker responses should not be expected to provide useful predictions of relevant ecological effects—and probably not even predictions of whole-organism effects. Suites of biomarkers are only likely to provide increased predictability if they can be used in a comprehensive mechanistic model that integrates them into a measure of fitness. Until this can be achieved, biomarkers may be useful for hypothesis generation in carefully controlled experiments. However, because the aims of environmental monitoring and ecological risk assessment are to detect and/or predict adverse chemical impacts on populations, communities, and ecosystems, we should be focusing our efforts on improving methods to do this directly. This will involve developing and testing models of appropriate complexity that can describe real-world systems at multiple scales.
机译:已经致力于开发和应用用于生态毒理学的生物标记物。这些努力的一部分原因是希望有预警指标,这些指标能在对个人和人口产生可衡量的影响之前就做出响应,部分原因是有助于确定观察到的人口和社区影响的原因。较早的生物标记物专注于生物生理或生物化学的测量,而分子生物学的进步正在将生物标记物的原理扩展到基因水平(即生态毒理基因组学)。但是,生物标记物在多大程度上能够提供明确的和生态学相关的毒物暴露或影响指标,仍然存在很大争议。在本文中,我们简要讨论了生物标志物在生态毒理学和生态风险评估中的应用,并提供了如何使用它们的示例。我们得出的结论是,尽管生物标志物可以帮助您深入了解导致化学物质对整个生物体性能产生影响的机理,并且在某些情况下可能提供有用的暴露指标,但不应期望单个生物标志物的反应对相关指标提供有用的预测生态影响,甚至可能没有对整个生物影响的预测。如果将生物标记物套件用于综合的机械模型,将其整合到适合程度中,则它们可能只会提供更高的可预测性。在实现这一目标之前,在严格控制的实验中,生物标志物可能对产生假设有用。但是,由于环境监测和生态风险评估的目的是检测和/或预测对人口,社区和生态系统的不利化学影响,因此我们应集中精力改进直接做到这一点的方法。这将涉及开发和测试适当复杂程度的模型,这些模型可以描述多尺度的真实世界系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号