首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAY DEVELOPMENT AND WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE EVALUATION AS ILLUSTRATED BY ECOTOXICOLOGICAL CASE STUDIES
【24h】

PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAY DEVELOPMENT AND WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE EVALUATION AS ILLUSTRATED BY ECOTOXICOLOGICAL CASE STUDIES

机译:生态毒理案例研究说明不良结果途径发展和证据权重评估的实用方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) describe toxicant effects as a sequential chain of causally linked events beginning with a molecular perturbation and culminating in an adverse outcome at an individual or population level. Strategies for developing AOPs are still evolving and depend largely on the intended use or motivation for development and data availability. The present review describes 4 ecotoxicological AOP case studies, developed for different purposes. In each situation, creation of the AOP began in a manner determined by the initial motivation for its creation and expanded either to include additional components of the pathway or to address the domains of applicability in terms of chemical initiators, susceptible species, life stages, and so forth. Some general strategies can be gleaned from these case studies, which a developer may find to be useful for supporting an existing AOP or creating a new one. Several web-based tools that can aid in AOP assembly and evaluation of weight of evidence for scientific robustness of AOP components are highlighted. (C) 2017 SETAC
机译:不良结局途径(AOP)将毒物作用描述为因果联系事件的顺序链,始于分子扰动,最终导致个人或人群的不良结局。开发AOP的策略仍在发展,并且在很大程度上取决于开发和数据可用性的预期用途或动机。本综述描述了针对不同目的开发的4个生态毒理AOP案例研究。在每种情况下,创建AOP的方式都取决于创建它的最初动机,并扩展为包括途径的其他组成部分或解决化学引发剂,易感物种,生命阶段和应用方面的适用领域等等。从这些案例研究中可以得出一些一般策略,开发人员可能会发现这些策略对于支持现有AOP或创建新AOP很有用。重点介绍了几种基于Web的工具,这些工具可以帮助AOP组装和评估证据的权重,以确保AOP组件的科学可靠性。 (C)2017年SETAC

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号