首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Technology >COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES FOR GROUND WATER DENITRIFICATION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES FOR GROUND WATER DENITRIFICATION

机译:地下水脱硝不同碳源的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study presents a comparison of denitrification rates and denitrification stoichiometry when using different sources of carbon. Denitrification tests were carried out in test bottles containing water and soil samples acquired at a nitrate-contaminated site and supplemented with either sucrose, acetate or ethanol. The tests demonstrated nitrate removal in all carbon source supplemented bottles. The rate of denitrification and the required amount of a carbon source, however, depended on the choice of substrate. Ethanol and acetate were found to provide the highest denitrification rate, that of 1.4 -1.6 mg·N l~(-1) d~(-1). Sucrose-supplemented bottles demonstrated a significantly slower denitrification rate, that of 0.6 - 0.9 mg-N l~(-1) d~(-1). In addition to slow denitrification rates, sucrose-supported denitrification required more carbon source.
机译:这项研究提出了使用不同碳源时反硝化率和反硝化化学计量的比较。在装有硝酸盐污染地点采集的水和土壤样品的测试瓶中进行反硝化测试,并补充蔗糖,乙酸盐或乙醇。测试表明,在所有碳源补充瓶中硝酸盐的去除。但是,反硝化的速度和所需的碳源量取决于底物的选择。发现乙醇和乙酸盐的反硝化率最高,为1.4 -1.6 mg·N l〜(-1)d〜(-1)。补充蔗糖的瓶子显示出明显较低的反硝化速率,为0.6-0.9 mg-N l〜(-1)d〜(-1)。除了缓慢的反硝化速率外,蔗糖支持的反硝化还需要更多的碳源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号