首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China
【24h】

Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China

机译:中国北京挥发性有机物源分配的受体模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Identifying the sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is key to reducing ground-level ozone and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Several receptor models have been developed to apportion sources, but an intercomparison of these models had not been performed for VOCs in China. In the present study, we compared VOC sources based on chemical mass balance (CMB), UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) models. Gasoline-related sources, petrochemical production, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) were identified by all three models as the major contributors, with UNMIX and PMF producing quite similar results. The contributions of gasoline-related sources and LPG estimated by the CMB model were higher, and petrochemical emissions were lower than in the UNMIX and PMF results, possibly because the VOC profiles used in the CMB model were for fresh emissions and the profiles extracted from ambient measurements by the two-factor analysis models were "aged".
机译:确定挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的来源是减少地面臭氧和次要有机气溶胶(SOA)的关键。已经开发了几种受体模型来分摊来源,但是在中国尚未对这些模型进行VOC的比较。在本研究中,我们比较了基于化学物质平衡(CMB),UNMIX和正矩阵分解(PMF)模型的VOC来源。所有这三个模型都将汽油相关的来源,石化产品生产和液化石油气(LPG)确定为主要贡献者,而UNMIX和PMF产生了非常相似的结果。 CMB模型估计的汽油相关源和LPG的贡献较高,石化排放低于UNMIX和PMF结果,这可能是因为CMB模型中使用的VOC曲线是用于新鲜排放,并且是从环境中提取的通过两因素分析模型进行的测量是“老化的”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号