首页> 外文期刊>Environmental policy and governance >Caught Between Personal and Collective Values: Biodiversity conservation in European decision-making
【24h】

Caught Between Personal and Collective Values: Biodiversity conservation in European decision-making

机译:陷入个人价值观和集体价值观之间:欧洲决策中的生物多样性保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Individual decision-makers at different governance levels operate in social contexts, which means that they sometimes need to compromise their personal values. Yet, this dissonance is rarely the direct target of empirical analyses of environmental decision-making. We undertake a Q-analysis of decision-makers' personal perspectives and the perspectives they perceive to dominate in their decision-making contexts. Our empirical analysis addresses biodiversity conservation, which has traditionally been justified with intrinsic value- and science-based arguments. The arguments have recently been broadened with the concept of ecosystem services, highlighting human benefits and values. This evolving context is interesting because of the new rise of anthropocentric values, which can lead to decision-makers experiencing dissonance. Our analysis of interviews with 43 biodiversity conservation decision-makers from nine European countries reveals four personally held perspectives that highlight different, yet partly overlapping, values - intrinsic, human benefit, conservation and connection - as well as three perspectives perceived to dominate in decision-making - utilitarian, insurance and knowledge values. The comparison of personally held and perceived dominant perspectives points to one major conflict: those decision-makers who personally associate with intrinsic values and perceive utilitarian values to dominate in decision-making experience dissonance. By contrast, personally held human benefit values are accommodated well in decision-making contexts and decision-makers who perceive insurance values to dominate experience the least conflict with personally held values. These findings demonstrate the potential of arguments stressing long-term benefits for easing tension and conflicts in conservation decision-making, and the usefulness of empirically testing of the coincidence of individual and social values. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
机译:处于不同治理级别的个人决策者在社会环境中运作,这意味着他们有时需要妥协自己的个人价值观。然而,这种不和谐很少成为环境决策实证分析的直接目标。我们对决策者的个人观点以及他们认为在决策环境中占主导地位的观点进行Q分析。我们的实证分析涉及生物多样性保护,传统上,这种保护已通过内在价值和基于科学的论证得以证明。最近,通过生态系统服务的概念扩大了争论,强调了人类的利益和价值。由于人类中心价值观的新崛起,这种不断变化的环境很有趣,这可能导致决策者出现失调。我们对来自9个欧洲国家/地区的43位生物多样性保护决策者进行的访谈分析揭示了四种个人观点,这些观点强调了不同但部分重叠的价值观-内在价值,人类利益,保护和联系-以及被认为在决策中占主导地位的三种观点-制作-功利,保险和知识价值。个人持有和感知到的主导观点的比较指出了一个主要冲突:那些与内在价值相关联并认为功利主义价值在决策经验中占主导地位的决策者。相比之下,个人拥有的人类利益价值在决策环境中得到了很好的适应,并且认为保险价值占主导地位的决策者与个人拥有的价值的冲突最少。这些发现表明,争论可能会带来长期利益,以减轻养护决策中的紧张局势和冲突,以及对个人和社会价值的一致性进行实证检验的有用性。版权所有(c)2017 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd和ERP Environment

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号