首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Market-based policies for demand side energy efficiency: A comparison of the New South Wales Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme and the United Kingdom's Energy Efficiency Commitment
【24h】

Market-based policies for demand side energy efficiency: A comparison of the New South Wales Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme and the United Kingdom's Energy Efficiency Commitment

机译:基于市场的需求侧能效政策:新南威尔士州温室气体减排计划与英国能效承诺的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Market-based policies to improve demand side energy efficiency are a comparatively new but increasingly popular approach to greenhouse gas abatement. The governments of New South Wales and the United Kingdom have both been enthusiastic adopters of market-based energy efficiency schemes. However, the New South Wales Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme (NGAS) and the United Kingdom's Energy Efficiency Commitment (EEC) represent two contrasting approaches to bringing about improvements in demand side energy efficiency. By comparing the performance of these two schemes a number of tentative conclusions are drawn regarding the successful design of such schemes. In particular it is asserted that policy makers should exercise caution in designing "comprehensive" abatement schemes with energy efficiency objectives -NGAS and EEC performance suggests that targeted schemes will be more effective. .In particular these findings raise doubts over the perceived simplicity of market-based schemes, and the economics of demand side energy efficiency.
机译:以市场为基础的提高需求侧能源效率的政策是一种相对较新的方法,但越来越受欢迎。新南威尔士州和英国政府都积极采用基于市场的能效计划。但是,新南威尔士州的温室气体减排计划(NGAS)和英国的能源效率承诺(EEC)代表了两种截然不同的方法,可以提高需求方的能源效率。通过比较这两种方案的性能,得出了关于这种方案成功设计的许多初步结论。特别要指出的是,决策者在设计具有能源效率目标的“综合”减排方案时应谨慎行事-NGAS和EEC的性能表明,针对性方案将更加有效。特别是,这些发现使人们对基于市场的方案的简单性以及需求方能源效率的经济学产生了怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号