首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modelling & Software >Innovative approaches in integrated assessment modelling of European air pollution control strategies - Implications of dealing with multi-pollutant multi-effect problems
【24h】

Innovative approaches in integrated assessment modelling of European air pollution control strategies - Implications of dealing with multi-pollutant multi-effect problems

机译:欧洲空气污染控制策略综合评估建模中的创新方法-处理多污染物多影响问题的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, crucial aspects of the implications and the complexity of interconnected multi-pollutant multi-effect assessments of both air pollution control strategies and the closely related reduction of greenhouse gas emissions will be discussed. The main aims of the work described here are to identify the core problems which occur when trying to apply current state-of-the-art methodology to conduct integrated assessments - in this context, cost-benefit assessment (CBA) as well as cost-effectiveness assessment (CEA) -using sophisticated computer models and propose solutions to the problems identified. The approaches described will display the integrated use of databases, efficient algorithms and already existing software tools and models in a unified model framework. The first part of the paper discusses the need for new developments in one particular field of Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), which is the use of (typically) country-specific single pollutant abatement cost curves, which have been applied in a large number of modelling approaches with the aim to find cost-effective solutions for given air quality targets. However, research conducted to find such cost-effective solutions for the non-linear problem of tropospheric ozone abatement (dealing with two primary pollutants and their rather complex relationship to form tropospheric ozone, [see] [Friedrich, R., Reis, S. (Eds.), 2000. Tropospheric Ozone Abatement - Developing Efficient Strategies for the Reduction of Ozone Precursor Emissions in Europe. Springer Publishers] identified basic problems of cost curve based approaches even in this two-pollutant case. The approach discussed here promises to solve the key problems identified, making extensive use of databases in order to provide fast and high quality model input for CEA and CBA. In addition to that, the application of Genetic Algorithms will be discussed as a means to address extremely complex, vast solution spaces which are typical for the tasks IAMs are set to solve nowadays. As the application of the model in extensive assessment studies is currently under way, it is yet too early for a full evaluation of lessons learned. However, initial tests of performance and behaviour have shown robust and promising results.
机译:在本文中,将讨论影响空气污染控制策略和密切相关的减少温室气体排放的相互关联的多污染物多影响评估的影响和复杂性的关键方面。此处描述的工作的主要目的是确定尝试应用当前最先进的方法进行综合评估时出现的核心问题-在这种情况下,是成本效益评估(CBA)有效性评估(CEA)-使用复杂的计算机模型并为发现的问题提出解决方案。所描述的方法将在统一的模型框架中显示数据库,高效算法以及已经存在的软件工具和模型的集成使用。本文的第一部分讨论了在综合评估模型(IAM)的特定领域中的新发展的需求,即使用(通常是)特定于国家/地区的单一污染物减排成本曲线,该曲线已被大量采用。建模方法,旨在为给定的空气质量目标找到具有成本效益的解决方案。然而,进行了研究以找到对流层臭氧消减的非线性问题(用两种主要污染物进行交易以及形成对流层臭氧的相当复杂的关系)的这种经济有效的解决方案,[参见] [Friedrich,R.,Reis,S. (编),2000年。《对流层臭氧减排-制定减少欧洲臭氧前体排放的有效战略》,施普林格出版社[Springer Publishers]确定了基于成本曲线的方法的基本问题,即使在这两种污染物的情况下,此处讨论的方法也有望解决。识别出的关键问题,将广泛使用数据库,以便为CEA和CBA提供快速,高质量的模型输入;此外,还将讨论遗传算法的应用,以解决极其复杂,庞大的解决方案空间, IAM目前正在解决的任务中很典型,因为该模型目前正在广泛的评估研究中应用,但现在还为时过早对经验教训的全面评估。但是,对性能和行为的初步测试显示了可靠且有希望的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号