首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review
【24h】

Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review

机译:混合MCDA方法在森林管理规划中整合多种生态系统服务:一项重要评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a decision aid frequently used in the field of forest management planning. It includes the evaluation of multiple criteria such as the production of timber and non-timber forest products and tangible as well as intangible values of ecosystem services (ES). Hence, it is beneficial compared to those methods that take a purely financial perspective. Accordingly, MCDA methods are increasingly popular in the wide field of sustainability assessment. Hybrid approaches allow aggregating MCDA and, potentially, other decision-making techniques to make use of their individual benefits and leading to a more holistic view of the actual consequences that come with certain decisions. This review is providing a comprehensive overview of hybrid approaches that are used in forest management planning. Today, the scientific world is facing increasing challenges regarding the evaluation of ES and the trade-offs between them, for example between provisioning and regulating services. As the preferences of multiple stakeholders are essential to improve the decision process in multi-purpose forestry, participatory and hybrid approaches turn out to be of particular importance. Accordingly, hybrid methods show great potential for becoming most relevant in future decision making. Based on the review presented here, the development of models for the use in planning processes should focus on participatory modeling and the consideration of uncertainty regarding available information.
机译:多标准决策分析(MCDA)是森林管理规划领域中经常使用的决策辅助工具。它包括对多个标准的评估,例如木材和非木材林产品的生产以及生态系统服务的有形和无形价值。因此,与那些纯粹从财务角度来看的方法相比,它是有益的。因此,MCDA方法在可持续性评估的广泛领域中越来越受欢迎。混合方法允许聚集MCDA以及可能的其他决策技术,以利用其各自的优势,并从整体上了解某些决策带来的实际后果。这篇综述提供了森林管理规划中使用的混合方法的全面概述。如今,科学界在评估ES及其之间的权衡方面(例如在提供和调节服务之间)面临着越来越多的挑战。由于多方利益相关者的偏好对于改善多用途林业的决策过程至关重要,因此参与式和混合式方法尤为重要。因此,混合方法显示出在未来决策中变得最相关的巨大潜力。基于此处提出的评论,在计划过程中使用模型的开发应集中在参与性建模和对有关可用信息的不确定性的考虑上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2015年第2期|373-388|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Forest Management, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany;

    Institute of Forest Management, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany;

    Department of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Center, 2211-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada;

    Institute of Forest Management, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecosystem services; Trade-offs; Forest management planning; Stakeholder participation; Uncertainty; Quantitative optimization; Multiple criteria;

    机译:生态系统服务;权衡;森林经营计划;利益相关者的参与;不确定;定量优化;多个条件;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:26:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号