首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Addressing Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Together: A Global Assessment of Agriculture and Forestry Projects
【24h】

Addressing Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Together: A Global Assessment of Agriculture and Forestry Projects

机译:共同应对减缓和适应气候变化:农业和林业项目的全球评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Adaptation and mitigation share the ultimate purpose of reducing climate change impacts. However, they tend to be considered separately in projects and policies because of their different objectives and scales. Agriculture and forestry are related to both adaptation and mitigation: they contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and removals, are vulnerable to climate variations, and form part of adaptive strategies for rural livelihoods. We assessed how climate change project design documents (PDDs) considered a joint contribution to adaptation and mitigation in forestry and agriculture in the tropics, by analyzing 201 PDDs from adaptation funds, mitigation instruments, and project standards [e.g., climate community and biodiversity (CCB)]. We analyzed whether PDDs established for one goal reported an explicit contribution to the other (i.e., whether mitigation PDDs contributed to adaptation and vice versa). We also examined whether the proposed activities or expected outcomes allowed for potential contributions to the two goals. Despite the separation between the two goals in international and national institutions, 37 % of the PDDs explicitly mentioned a contribution to the other objective, although only half of those substantiated it. In addition, most adaptation (90 %) and all mitigation PDDs could potentially report a contribution to at least partially to the other goal. Some adaptation project developers were interested in mitigation for the prospect of carbon funding, whereas mitigation project developers integrated adaptation to achieve greater long-term sustainability or to attain CCB certification. International and national institutions can provide incentives for projects to harness synergies and avoid trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation.
机译:适应和缓解的最终目的是减少气候变化的影响。但是,由于它们的目标和规模不同,它们往往在项目和政策中被单独考虑。农业和林业与适应和减缓都息息相关:它们造成温室气体的排放和清除,易受气候变化的影响,并成为农村生计适应战略的一部分。通过分析适应资金,缓解工具和项目标准中的201个PDD,我们评估了气候变化项目设计文件(PDD)如何考虑对热带地区林业和农业的适应和减灾做出的共同贡献[例如,气候社区和生物多样性(CCB) )]。我们分析了为一个目标建立的PDD是否报告了对另一目标的显式贡献(即缓解PDD是否对适应做出了贡献,反之亦然)。我们还检查了提议的活动或预期成果是否允许对这两个目标做出潜在贡献。尽管国际机构和国家机构的两个目标是分开的,但是37%的PDD中明确提到了对另一个目标的贡献,尽管只有一半的实现了该目标。此外,大多数适应措施(90%)和所有缓解措施PDD都可能报告至少对另一目标的贡献。一些适应项目开发商对缓解碳融资的前景很感兴趣,而缓解项目开发商对适应进行了整合,以实现更大的长期可持续性或获得CCB认证。国际和国家机构可以为利用协同效应并避免适应与缓解之间的权衡取舍的项目提供激励。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2016年第2期|271-282|共12页
  • 作者单位

    UNEP DTU Partnership on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, UN City, Marmorvej 51, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark;

    CIFOR, PO Box 1558, 15024 Lima, Peru,CIRAD BSEF, Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;

    CIFOR, PO Box 1558, 15024 Lima, Peru;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    REDD+; Emissions; Vulnerability; Landscape; Ecosystem services; Livelihoods;

    机译:REDD +;排放物;漏洞;景观;生态系统服务;生计;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:25:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号