首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Greening Environmental Rights: Separating Law and Morality in Environmental Public Interest Litigation in Pakistan
【24h】

Greening Environmental Rights: Separating Law and Morality in Environmental Public Interest Litigation in Pakistan

机译:绿色环保权:巴基斯坦环境公益诉讼中的法律与道德分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many environmentalists consider active environmental litigation in developing countries to be a positive development. However, in Pakistan, a country that encourages public interest litigation, this system poses serious institutional and legal problems that may hinder the development of an effective national response to environmental challenges. Those litigating for environmental protection in Pakistan may be relying too heavily on the courts to take measures that should be within the jurisdiction of the Pakistan EPA. In this Article, Dominic J. Nardi Jr. warns that judicial activism might lead to conflicts with the executive, or could encourage environmental regulators to spurn responsibility for handling future environmental problems. He recommends that the judiciary relegate public interest cases based on statutes to the country's Environmental Tribunals, since they presumably have the expertise necessary to adjudicate these types of cases. For public interest cases relying on fundamental rights or morality, the Federal Shariat Court may be the best venue for equitable relief.
机译:许多环保主义者认为,发展中国家积极开展环境诉讼是一种积​​极的发展。但是,在一个鼓励公共利益诉讼的国家巴基斯坦,该制度带来了严重的体制和法律问题,可能会阻碍国家对环境挑战做出有效的反应。那些在巴基斯坦提起环境保护诉讼的人可能过于依赖法院采取应在巴基斯坦EPA管辖范围内的措施。多米尼克·纳迪(Dominic J. Nardi Jr.)在本文中警告说,司法行动主义可能会导致与行政当局发生冲突,或者可能鼓励环境监管者放弃应对未来环境问题的责任。他建议司法机构根据法规将相关公共利益案件移交给该国的环境法庭,因为它们可能具有裁定此类案件所必需的专业知识。对于依赖基本权利或道德的公共利益案件,联邦伊斯兰教法法院可能是公平救济的最佳场所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号