首页> 外文期刊>Environmental history >Trees, Forested Landscapes, and Grazing Animals: A European Perspective on Woodlands and Grazed Treescapes
【24h】

Trees, Forested Landscapes, and Grazing Animals: A European Perspective on Woodlands and Grazed Treescapes

机译:树木,森林景观和放牧动物:欧洲对林地和草木景观的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What role is there for the historian in establishing conservation goals? Are conservationists trying to recover a past nature or managing the inevitable process of change brought about by human activities, making any such recovery illusory? Should our perception of the problem be changed by the much heralded arrival of the anthropo-cene? And how has the re-wilding agenda transformed the problem? These are some of the questions provoked by this wide-ranging volume, the latest product of Ian Rotherham's conferences on woodlands and treescapes at the University of Sheffield. It's a somewhat unwieldy volume, perhaps needing a clearer set of organizing themes and sometimes more sharply structured chapters, but there is no doubting its richness or the fascinating detail and insight to be found in its twenty-seven chapters. Oliver Rackham provides the punchy opening. He emphasizes the particular need to distinguish woodland from wood pasture or savannah (a word that seems exotic to British ears), suggesting conservationists should "normally stick... to trying to preserve what is there, rather than recover what might have been." Woodland pasture, as Keith Alexander explains, is not degraded forest but an important ecosystem in its own right, which must be managed to allow trees to complete the lifecycle, fulfilling all their eco-services. But Rackham's "might" is crucial, for running through many of these essays, be they field reports on current conservation or re-wilding projects, analyses of natural history, or exercises in the cultural history of woodscapes, are two broad historical problems or perspectives.
机译:历史学家在建立保护目标方面扮演什么角色?保护主义者是否在试图恢复过去的自然或管理人类活动带来的不可避免的变化过程,从而使任何这种恢复的幻想都是虚幻的?人类事件的到来预示着我们是否应该改变我们对问题的看法?重新制定的议程如何改变了这个问题?这是Ian Rotherham在谢菲尔德大学举行的有关林地和树木景观会议的最新成果,引发了广泛的问题。这本书有些笨拙,可能需要更清晰的组织主题集,有时还需要结构清晰的章节,但是毫无疑问,它的丰富性或在其第二十七章中可以找到引人入胜的细节和见解。 Oliver Rackham提供了有力的开口。他强调特别需要将林地与牧草或大草原区分开来(这个词在英国人的耳朵看来是异国情调的),建议环境保护主义者“通常应坚持……试图保护那里的东西,而不是恢复曾经的东西”。正如基思·亚历山大(Keith Alexander)解释的那样,林地牧场并不是退化的森林,而是本身重要的生态系统,必须对其进行管理,以使树木完成生命周期,并履行其所有生态服务。但是拉克汉姆的“力量”至关重要,因为贯穿其中的许多文章,无论是现场报道有关当前保护或重新野生项目,对自然历史的分析,还是对木景文化历史的演习,都是两个广泛的历史问题或观点。 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental history》 |2015年第1期|131-133|共3页
  • 作者

    Matthew Kelly;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southampton;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:05:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号