首页> 外文期刊>Environmental ethics >The Lynn White Thesis: Reception and Legacy
【24h】

The Lynn White Thesis: Reception and Legacy

机译:林恩·怀特论文:接待与传承

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If we are to accurately gauge the validity of Lynn White, Jr.'s thesis as articulated in his article, "The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis" (1967), we must bring together recent research not only in the fields of environmental ethics and ecotheology but also in environmental history. We must also consider White's work as a whole, including his Medieval Technology and Social Change (1962), which has been ignored for the most part by non-medievalists. Environmental history provides a corrective to White by anchoring medieval attitudes and practices in specific times and places and demonstrating that the medieval period was not monolithic or uniform with respect to attitudes toward nature. Recent work by medieval environmental historians confirms that while many of the broad claims made by White in "Roots" and Medieval Technology and Social Change must be strongly qualified, his central point that medieval agriculture was an important part of European environmental history has been largely sustained.
机译:如果我们要准确地评估小林恩·怀特(Lynn White,Jr.)在其论文“我们的生态危机的历史根源”(1967年)中阐明的论点,那么我们不仅必须将环境伦理学领域的最新研究汇总起来和生态神学,也包括环境历史。我们还必须考虑怀特的整个工作,包括他的《中世纪技术和社会变革》(1962年),该著作在很大程度上被非中世纪主义者所忽略。环境历史通过在特定的时间和地点锚定中世纪的态度和做法,并证明中世纪时期对自然的态度不是单一的或统一的,从而对怀特进行了纠正。中世纪环境历史学家最近的工作证实,尽管怀特在“根源”和中世纪技术与社会变革中提出的许多广泛主张必须具有很高的资格,但他的中心观点是中世纪农业是欧洲环境历史的重要组成部分,这一观点在很大程度上得到了维持。 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental ethics》 |2013年第3期|313-331|共19页
  • 作者

    Elspeth Whitney;

  • 作者单位

    Department of History, Box 455020, 4505 South Maryland Parkway, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5020;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:03:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号