首页> 外文期刊>Environmental ethics >Some Fundamentals of Conservation in South and West Africa
【24h】

Some Fundamentals of Conservation in South and West Africa

机译:南非和西非的一些保护基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aldo Leopold's draft essay "Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest" from 1923 (first published in the introductory volume of Environmental Ethics in the 1979) shows that his initially expressed moral concerns were primary to his view of conservation. In addition, this early essay also challenged dominant perceptions of environmental degradation in the southwestern United States in the 1920s. For these reasons, it provides a framework for examining conservation as a moral issue in South and West Africa, especially in the nations of South Africa and Ghana, building on J. Baird Callicott's summaries of Yoruba (Nigerian/ West African) and San (southern African) environmental ethics in Earth's Insights (1994). In the context of poverty, traditional community taboos may have already supplied the social norms of conservation that Leopold desired, but they are marginalized by modernization. As in Leopold's essay, mainstream perceptions of environmental degradation viewed through the lens of political ecology suggest that international market forces may be more ecologically disruptive than traditional peasant agriculture. Land ethics similar to Leopold's are implicit within the political philosophies of two of the regions' most respected recent leaders, Nelson Mandela (South Africa), who promoted land reform, and Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana), who promoted pan-Africanism over neocolonialism. Community-based solutions to conservation issues illustrate the successes, failures, and the challenging complexity of modernization in these subregions.
机译:阿尔多·利奥波德(Aldo Leopold)于1923年撰写的论文《西南保护的一些基本原理》(于1979年在《环境伦理学》简介卷中首次出版)表明,他最初表达的道德关切是其保护观点的主要内容。此外,这篇早期文章还挑战了1920年代美国西南部对环境退化的主流看法。由于这些原因,它以J. Baird Callicott对约鲁巴(尼日利亚/西非)和圣(南部)的总结为基础,提供了一个框架,将保护作为一个在南非和西非,尤其是在南非和加纳国家中的道德问题进行研究。非洲)中的环境伦理学,见《地球的见解》(1994年)。在贫困的情况下,传统的社区禁忌也许已经提供了利奥波德所期望的社会保护准则,但由于现代化而被边缘化。就像在利奥波德的文章中一样,从政治生态学的角度来看,对环境退化的主流看法表明,国际市场力量可能比传统的农民农业更具生态破坏力。类似于利奥波德的土地伦理隐含在该地区最近两位最受尊敬的领导人,促进土地改革的纳尔逊·曼德拉(南非)和倡导泛非新殖民主义的夸梅·恩克鲁玛(加纳)的政治哲学中。基于社区的保护问题解决方案说明了这些分区域现代化的成功,失败和复杂的挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental ethics》 |2014年第1期|5-30|共26页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Social and Cultural Analysis, Vera Dugas Liberal Arts North Building LAN 335, P.O. Box 13047, SFA Station, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX 75962;

    Department of Govern ment, 124 Vera Dugas Liberal Arts North, Building, P.O. Box 13045, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, TX 75962;

    Division of Multidisciplinary Programs, P.O. Box 6082, SFA Station, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX 75962;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:03:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号