首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >COVID-19 Creating another problem? Sustainable solution for PPE disposal through LCA approach
【24h】

COVID-19 Creating another problem? Sustainable solution for PPE disposal through LCA approach

机译:covid-19创建另一个问题? 通过LCA方法进行PPE处理的可持续解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Amid COVID-19, there have been rampant increase in the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) kits by frontline health and sanitation communities, to reduce the likelihoods of infections. The used PPE kits, potentially being infectious, pose a threat to human health, terrestrial, and marine ecosystems, if not scientifically handled and disposed. However, with stressed resources on treatment facilities and lack of training to the health and sanitation workers, it becomes vital to vet different options for PPE kits disposal, to promote environmentally sound management of waste. Given the various technology options available for treatment and disposal of COVID-19 patients waste, Life Cycle Assessment, i.e., cradle to grave analysis of PPE provides essential guidance in identifying the environmentally sound alternatives. In the present work, Life Cycle Assessment of PPE kits has been performed using GaBi version 8.7 under two disposal scenarios, namely landfill and incineration (both centralized and decentralized) for six environmental impact categories covering overall impacts on both terrestrial and marine ecosystems, which includes Global Warming Potential (GWP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Acidification Potential (AP), Freshwater Aquatic Ecotoxicity Potential (FAETP) and Photochemical Ozone Depletion Potential (POCP). Considering the inventories of PPE kits, disposal of PPE bodysuit has the maximum impact, followed by gloves and goggles, in terms of GWP. The use of metal strips in face-mask has shown the most significant HTP impact. The incineration process (centralized-3816 kg CO2 eq. and decentralized-3813 kg CO2 eq.) showed high GWP but significantly reduced impact w.r.t. AP, EP, FAETP, POCP and HTP, when compared to disposal in a landfill, resulting in the high overall impact of landfill disposal compared to incineration. The decentralized incineration has emerged as environmentally sound management option compared to centralized incinerator among all the impact categories, also the environmental impact by transportation is significant (2.76 kg CO2 eq.) and cannot be neglected for long-distance transportation. Present findings can help the regulatory authority to delineate action steps for safe disposal of PPE kits.
机译:在Covid-19中,使用个人防护设备(PPE)套件通过前线健康和卫生社区的使用猖獗,以降低感染的可能性。如果没有科学处理和处置,潜在的PPE试剂盒可能是传染性,对人类健康,陆地和海洋生态系统构成威胁。然而,由于对治疗设施的强调资源和对健康和卫生工作者缺乏培训,对PPE套件处置的不同选择变得至关重要,促进浪费的环境管理。鉴于可用于处理和处理Covid-19患者废物的各种技术选择,生命周期评估,即对PPE的严重分析,摇篮在识别环境中替代方案方面提供了基本指导。在本作本作的情况下,PPE试剂盒的生命周期评估使用了GABI版本8.7在两个处置方案下进行,即填埋场和焚烧(集中式和分散),用于涵盖包括的陆地和海洋生态系统的总体影响全球变暖潜力(GWP),人体毒性电位(HTP),富营养化潜力(EP),酸化潜力(AP),淡水水生生态毒性潜力(FAEPTP)和光化学臭氧耗尽电位(POCP)。考虑到PPE试剂盒的库存,PPE紧身衣裤的处理具有最大的影响,然后是GWP的型手套和护目镜。在面膜中使用金属条带来了最显着的HTP冲击。焚烧过程(集中式-3816千克CO2等式和分散-3813千克CO2等等。)显示出高GWP但显着减少了影响。 AP,EP,FAETP,POCP和HTP,与垃圾填埋场处置相比,导致垃圾填埋场处理的总体影响很高,而焚烧填埋场。与集中焚烧炉相比,分散的焚烧是由于所有影响类别中的集中焚化炉相比,运输的环境影响很大(2.76公斤CO2等等),对于长途运输不能忽视。目前的调查结果可以帮助监管机构描绘行动步骤以便安全处置PPE套件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号