首页> 外文期刊>English Historical Review, The >Early Modernisation Theory? The Eisenhower Administration and the Foreign Policy of Development in Brazil *
【24h】

Early Modernisation Theory? The Eisenhower Administration and the Foreign Policy of Development in Brazil *

机译:早期现代化理论?艾森豪威尔政府与巴西的外交发展政策*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Existing views of the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration’s policies in Latin America have tended to portray its approach as being either fixated upon waging the Cold War, or overly concerned with quelling outbreaks of Latin American economic nationalism. Eisenhower’s approach has been viewed as regressive and reactionary; more concerned with political stability than economic and social progress. This view, moreover, has been strengthened by the actions of Eisenhower’s successor – John F. Kennedy’s announcement of the Alliance for Progress, and the prominent role played by Modernization Theory in his administration’s approach toward the developing world, have been viewed as a stark contrast to what had come before. This article challenges that prevailing view, however, by examining the Eisenhower administration’s economic policy towards Brazil. In developmental terms, it will be argued, Eisenhower’s approach was not so very different from Kennedy’s: the methods and theoretical underpinnings between the two administrations may have differed, but what they ultimately wanted to achieve – flourishing nation states that were prosperous, pro-American, and ultimately democratic – remained a constant goal. Like Kennedy, Eisenhower’s approach was constructed on a singular belief in the best way for a nation to develop; it was a standpoint that, due to the country’s economic potential, could be most clearly identified in Brazil. In examining Eisenhower’s economic approach toward Brazil, therefore, this article suggests that there is a compelling need for us to reperiodize the era of Modernization with regard to US developmental policy in Latin America.
机译:对艾森豪威尔政府在拉美的政策的现有看法倾向于将其做法描述为要么发动冷战,要么过分担心平息拉丁美洲经济民族主义的爆发。艾森豪威尔的方法被认为是渐进和反动的。更加关注政治稳定,而不是经济和社会进步。此外,艾森豪威尔继任者约翰·肯尼迪(John F. Kennedy)宣布建立进步联盟的行动进一步巩固了这一观点,而现代化理论在他的政府对发展中世界的态度中所起的显著作用被视为鲜明对比。到以前发生的事情。但是,本文通过研究艾森豪威尔政府对巴西的经济政策,挑战了这一主流观点。有人认为,从发展的角度来看,艾森豪威尔的方法与肯尼迪的方法并没有太大不同:两个政府之间的方法和理论基础可能有所不同,但它们最终想要实现的目标是:繁荣,繁荣的民族国家,亲美的国家。 ,最终实现民主-始终是我们的目标。与肯尼迪一样,艾森豪威尔的方法也是基于对国家发展的最佳方式的单一信念。有一种观点认为,由于该国的经济潜力,可以在巴西最清楚地确定这一点。因此,在考察艾森豪威尔对巴西的经济方法时,本文提出,迫切需要我们重新考虑现代化时代,以适应美国在拉丁美洲的发展政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号