...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Material modelling in the seismic response analysis for the design of RC framed structures
【24h】

Material modelling in the seismic response analysis for the design of RC framed structures

机译:RC框架结构地震反应分析中的材料建模。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two similar continuum plasticity material models are used to examine the influence of material modelling on the seismic response of reinforced concrete frame structures. In the first model reinforced concrete is modelled as a homogenised material using.an isotropic Drucker-Prager yield criterion. In the second model, also based on the Drucker-Prager criterion, concrete and reinforcement are included separately. While the latter considers strain softening in tension the former does not. The seismic input is provided using the Eurocode 8 elastic spectrum and five compatible acceleration histories. The results show that the design response from response history analyses (RHAs) is significantly different for the two models. The influence of compression hardening and strength enhancement with strain rate is also examined for the two models. It is found that the effect of these parameters is relatively small. In recent years there has been considerable research in nonlinear static analysis (NSA) or pushover procedures for seismic design. The NSA response is frequently compared with that obtained using RHA, which also uses the same material models, to verify the accuracy of the static procedure. A number of features exhibited by reinforced concrete during dynamic or cyclic loading cannot be easily included in a static procedure. The design NSA and RHA responses for the two material models are compared. The NSA procedures considered are the Displacement Coefficient Method and the Capacity Spectrum Method. A comparison of RHA and NSA procedures shows that there can be a significant difference in local design response even though the target deformation values at the control node are close. Moreover, the difference between the mean peak RHA response and the pushover response is not independent of the material model.
机译:使用两个相似的连续塑性材料模型来检查材料模型对钢筋混凝土框架结构地震响应的影响。在第一个模型中,使用等向性Drucker-Prager屈服准则将钢筋混凝土建模为均质材料。在第二个模型中,同样基于Drucker-Prager标准,混凝土和钢筋分别包含在内。后者考虑张力的应变软化,而前者则不考虑。地震输入使用欧洲规范8弹性频谱和五个兼容的加速度历史记录提供。结果表明,响应历史分析(RHA)的设计响应对于这两个模型有显着差异。还研究了两种模型的压缩硬化和强度增强对应变率的影响。发现这些参数的影响相对较小。近年来,在用于地震设计的非线性静力分析(NSA)或推覆程序方面进行了大量研究。经常将NSA响应与使用同样材料模型的RHA获得的响应进行比较,以验证静态过程的准确性。钢筋混凝土在动态或循环加载过程中表现出的许多功能无法轻松地包含在静态过程中。比较了两种材料模型的设计NSA和RHA响应。考虑的NSA程序是位移系数法和容量谱法。 RHA和NSA程序的比较表明,即使控制节点处的目标变形值接近,局部设计响应也可能存在显着差异。而且,平均峰值RHA响应和推覆响应之间的差异与材料模型无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号