...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >A numerical investigation into the plastic buckling paradox for circular cylindrical shells under axial compression
【24h】

A numerical investigation into the plastic buckling paradox for circular cylindrical shells under axial compression

机译:轴向压缩下圆柱壳塑性屈曲悖论的数值研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is widely accepted that for many buckling problems of plates and shells in the plastic range the flow theory of plasticity leads to a significant overestimation of the buckling stress while the deformation theory provides much more accurate predictions and is therefore generally recommended for use in practical applications. The present work aims to contribute to further understanding of the seeming differences between these two theories with particular regards to circular cylindrical shells subjected to axial compression. A clearer understanding of the two theories is established using accurate numerical examples and comparisons with some widely cited accurate physical test results. It is found that, contrary to common perception, by using a geometrically nonlinear finite element formulation with carefully determined and validated constitutive laws very good agreement between numerical and test results can be obtained in the case of the physically more sound flow theory of plasticity. The reasons underlying the apparent buckling paradox found in the literature regarding the application of deformation and flow theories and the different conclusions reached in this work are investigated and discussed in detail.
机译:对于塑性范围内的板和壳体的许多屈曲问题,人们普遍接受,塑性流动理论导致对屈曲应力的明显高估,而变形理论提供了更准确的预测,因此通常建议在实际应用中使用。本工作旨在进一步理解这两种理论之间的表面差异,特别是对承受轴向压缩的圆柱壳。通过使用精确的数值示例并将其与一些被广泛引用的准确的物理测试结果进行比较,可以使人们对这两种理论有更清晰的理解。我们发现,与通常的看法相反,通过使用几何非线性有限元公式并仔细确定并验证本构定律,在物理上更为合理的塑性流动理论的情况下,可以在数值和测试结果之间取得很好的一致性。研究并详细讨论了有关变形和流动理论应用的文献中发现的明显屈曲悖论的原因以及得出的不同结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号